Clinical Analysis of Colistin Sulfate in the Treatment of Hematonosis Infected by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2023.06.043
- Author:
Yuan-Bing WU
1
;
Shan-Shan JIANG
1
;
Ya-Xue WU
1
;
Dong-Yang LI
1
;
Qian LI
1
;
Xing WANG
1
;
Bin LIU
1
;
Hai-Yan BAO
2
;
Xiao-Hui HU
3
Author Information
1. Department of Hematology, Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
2. Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
3. Department of Hematology, Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China,E-mail: hxh27@163.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
colistin sulfate;
gram-negative bacteria;
hematonosis;
multidrug-resistant bacteria
- MeSH:
Humans;
Colistin/adverse effects*;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*;
Meropenem/adverse effects*;
Treatment Outcome;
Gram-Negative Bacteria;
Hematologic Diseases
- From:
Journal of Experimental Hematology
2023;31(6):1878-1884
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in the treatment of hematonosis patients infected by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and discuss the possible factors that affect the efficacy of colistin sulfate.
METHODS:The clinical data of 85 hematologic patients infected with MDR GNB in the Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital from April 2022 to November 2022 were collected and divided into clinically effective group with 71 cases and ineffective group with 14 cases according to the therapeutic efficacy of colistin sulfate. The age, gender, type of hematologic disease, status of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, infection sites, type of pathogen, timing of administration, daily dose and duration of colistin sulfate, and combination with other antibacterial agents of patients in two groups were compared. Logistic regression was used to analyze on the meaningful variables to study the influencing factors of colistin sulfate. The adverse reactions of colistin sulfate were also evaluated.
RESULTS:There were no significant differences in age, gender, type of hematologic disease, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation status, infection sites and pathogen type between the effective group and the ineffective group (P>0.05). Compared with the medication time more than 7 days, meropenem used within 7 days in the clinical effective group, and timely replacement with colistin sulfate could obtain better efficacy, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.018). The duration of tigacycline before colistin sulfate did not affect the efficacy, and there was no significant difference in efficacy between the effective and ineffective groups. The therapeutic effect of colistin sulfate at daily dose of 500 000 U q8h was better than that of 500 000 U q12h, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.035). The time of colistin sulfate use in the clinically effective group was longer than that in the ineffective group, which had a statistical difference (P=0.003). Compared with the clinical ineffective group, the efficacy of combination regimens with colistin sulfate was better than that of colistin sulfate monotherapy, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the indicators with statistical differences in the two groups of patients, which suggested that the use time of colistin sulfate (B: 2.358; OR: 10.573; CI: 1.567-71.361; P=0.015) and the combination of colistin sulfate (B: 1.720; OR: 5.586; CI: 1.210-25.787; P=0.028) were influential factors in the efficacy of colistin sulfate. During the treatment, the incidence of nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and peripheral neurotoxicity were 5.9%, 1.2% and 1.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION:The use of colistin sulfate improves the clinical efficacy of MDR GNB infections in hematological patients, and the timing of colistin sulfate administration and the combination of drugs are independent factors affecting its clinical efficacy, and the safety during treatment is high.
