Effects of Apheresis Platelet Transfusion on PLT, MPV, PDW and PCT.
10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2023.06.034
- Author:
Yu-Qi TAO
1
;
Qin WANG
1
;
Yi-Wen LI
1
;
Jing-Zi YU-LAN
1
;
Zong-Sheng TANG
2
Author Information
1. Department of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China.
2. Department of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China.E-mail: tangzongsheng@163.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
apheresis platelet;
mean platelet volume;
platelet distribution width;
plateletcrit
- MeSH:
Humans;
Mean Platelet Volume;
Platelet Transfusion;
Blood Platelets;
Platelet Count/methods*;
Blood Component Removal
- From:
Journal of Experimental Hematology
2023;31(6):1820-1824
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the changes of platelet count (PLT), plateletcrit (PCT), mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) before and after apheresis platelet transfusion, the correlation between the parameters and their clinical significance.
METHODS:A total of 38 patients who received apheresis platelet transfusion were selected, their results of blood routine test closest to the time point of apheresis platelet transfusion were consulted from hospital information system and the changes of PLT, PCT, MPV and PDW were compared before and after transfusion. The correlation between above parameters was analyzed. The correlation of body mass index (BMI) with the increased multiple and increased value after platelet infusion was also analyzed.
RESULTS:Compared with pre-infusion, PLT and PCT significantly increased (both P <0.001) while MPV and PDW showed no significant difference after apheresis platelet transfusion (P >0.05). The difference of PLT and PCT before and after apheresis platelet transfusion had no correlation with PLT and PCT before transfusion (r =0.002, r =0.001), while the difference of MPV and PDW was negatively correlated with MPV and PDW before transfusion (r =-0.462, r =-0.610). The PLT growth rate was positively correlated with PCT growth rate before and after apheresis platelet transfusion (r =0.819). BMI was positively correlated with the increased multiple of PLT after infusion (r =0.721), but not with the increased value of PLT after infusion (r =0.374).
CONCLUSION:Apheresis platelet transfusion can cause platelet parameters change and shows different characteristics. Characteristic changes of platelet parameters and their correlation can be used as reference indices to evaluate the efficacy of apheresis platelet transfusion.
