Application of flat-sided culture tubes during prenatal diagnosis.
10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20221223-00888
- Author:
Tiansheng LIU
1
;
Hongqian HUANG
;
Jiangyu SU
;
Wangshang QIN
;
Dongmei FEI
;
Luping OUYANG
;
Minpan HUANG
;
Jinwu YU
;
Yaqin LEI
;
Shan OU
;
Weijia SUN
;
Qingming QIU
;
Qian ZHENG
Author Information
1. Central Laboratory for Genetic and Metabolic Disorders, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi 530003, China. qian.zheng@gosh.nhs.uk.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Child;
Female;
Pregnancy;
Humans;
China;
Prenatal Diagnosis;
Chorionic Villi Sampling;
Amniotic Fluid;
Cell Proliferation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
2023;40(10):1306-1311
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To assess the value of using flat-sided culture tubes for preparing chromosomes through chorionic villi (CV) and amniotic fluid (AF) cell cultures during prenatal diagnosis.
METHODS:From February to March 2020, 157 CV samples and 147 AF samples subjected to prenatal diagnosis at the Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were selected as the study subjects. For each sample, one flat-sided tube and one flask culture were set up by following the standard protocols. The methods were evaluated by comparing the cell growth, experimental process, quality of chromosome preparation and costs.
RESULTS:The success rates for the culturing of CV and AF samples by the flat-sided culture tube method were 97.45% (153/157) and 97.96% (144/147), respectively. By contrast, the success rates for the conventional flask method were 98.72% (155/157) for CV and 98.64% (145/147) for AF samples. No significant difference was found between the two methods (P > 0.05). The average harvest time required by the flat-sided culture tube method was 8.45 days for CV and 9.43 days for AF cultures, whilst the average harvest time for conventional flask method was 9.05 days and 9.54 days, respectively. The flat-sided culture tube method for CV had required significantly shorter average harvest time than the conventional method (P < 0.001). No statistical significant difference was found in the average harvest time for AF by the two methods (P > 0.05). The conventional culturing method had required three containers with two sample transfers. By contrast, the flat-sided culture tube method was carried out in one tube without any sample transfer. The average total amount of medium used was 3.91 mL for each flat-sided culture tube and 6.26 mL for each conventional flask.
CONCLUSION:The flat-sided culture tube method can provide a simple, cost-effective and error-reducing procedure for the CV and AF samples culture during prenatal diagnosis.
