Retrospective study on the modified Uhl technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pin in the treatment of Colles' fracture.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.09.006
- Author:
Zhao-Hui LI
1
;
Zhong-Yi SUN
1
;
Zhen NIE
2
;
Yu CHEN
2
;
Wei-Zhi NIE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Trauma Rehabilitation, Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital of Shandong, Weihai 264400, Shandong, China.
2. Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chinese osteopathology;
Closed needle;
Colles fracture;
Modified Uhl technique
- MeSH:
Humans;
Retrospective Studies;
Colles' Fracture/surgery*;
Fracture Fixation, Internal;
Fractures, Comminuted;
Hospitalization
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2023;36(9):821-826
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To retrospectively assess the advantages of the modified Uhl technique in the treatment of Colles' fracture guided by the principles of Chinese osteosynthesis (CO) concept.
METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted on 358 patients with Colles' fracture treated with the modified Uhl technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pin between January 2016 and June 2021. Out of these, 120 eligible cases were selected and categorized into two groups according to different surgical methods:the closed reduction and percutaneous pin group, and the open reduction group. Sixty-eight patients in the closed reduction and percutaneous pin group were treated with the modified Uhl technique, while fifty-two patients in the open reduction group were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using plates. The modified Sarmiento imaging score, Gartland-Werley wrist score, operation time, hospital stay, and treatment costs between the two groups were compared at a 6-month postoperative follow-up.
RESULTS:There were no significant differences in terms of gender, age, affected side, injure factors, time of injury to surgery, Sarmiento imaging score, and Gartland-Werley wrist joint score (P>0.05). The closed reduction and percutaneous pin group exhibited an operation time of (35.88±14.11) minutes, hospitalization stay of (9.78±2.48) days, and treatment costs of (16 074.91±1 964.48) yuan, while the open reduction group demonstrated comparatively longer operation time of (65.48±14.26) minutes, hospitalization stay of (15.88±2.00) days, and treatment costs of (20 451.27±1 760.22) yuan (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION:The modified Uhl technique presents notable advantages in the management of Colles' fracture, including reliable fixation, less trauma, shorter operation time, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness. This technique exhibits promising potential for broader clinical application. However, it is important to note that the pin could potentially damage tendons, and in cases of Colles' fractures with osteoporosis and comminuted fragments, additional techniques may be required for reliable fixation.
