A multicenter randomized controlled trial of domestic robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty.
10.7507/1002-1892.202307078
- Author:
Yicheng LI
1
;
Xiaogang ZHANG
1
;
Li CAO
1
;
Yongqiang SUN
2
;
Ye YE
2
;
Jie XIE
3
;
Yihe HU
3
;
Zhong LI
4
;
Bensen TANG
5
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi Xinjiang, 830054, P. R. China.
2. Department of Orthopedics, Luoyang Orthropedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou Henan, 450016, P. R. China.
3. Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310006, P. R. China.
4. Department of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646099, P. R. China.
5. Department of Orthopedics, the Guizhou Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Guiyang Guizhou, 550007, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Knee osteoarthritis;
multicenter study;
robot-assisted surgery;
total knee arthroplasty
- MeSH:
Humans;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods*;
Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery*;
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Robotics;
Knee Joint/surgery*;
Knee Prosthesis;
Retrospective Studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(11):1326-1334
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the accuracy, safety, and short-term effectiveness of a domestic robot-assisted system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
METHODS:Between December 2021 and February 2023, 138 patients with knee osteoarthritis who received TKA in 5 clinical centers were prospectively collected, and 134 patients met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either a trial group ( n=68) or a control group ( n=66). Seven patients had lost follow-up and missing data, so they were excluded and the remaining 127 patients were included for analysis, including 66 patients in the trial group and 61 patients in the control group. There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in gender, age, body mass index, side, duration of osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence grading, preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between the two groups. The trial group completed the TKA by domestic robot-assisted osteotomy according to the preoperative CT-based surgical planning. The control group was performed by traditional osteotomy plate combined with soft tissue release. Total operation time, osteotomy time of femoral/tibial side, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The radiographs were taken at 5 and 90 days after operation, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal angle of femur (LDFA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were measured. The difference between the measured values of the above indexes at two time points after operation and the preoperative planning target values was calculated, and the absolute value (absolute error) was taken for comparison between the two groups. The postoperative recovery of lower limb alignment was judged and the accuracy was calculated. KSS score and WOMAC score were used to evaluate the knee joint function of patients before operation and at 90 days after operation. The improvement rates of KSS score and WOMAC score were calculated. The function, stability, and convenience of the robot-assisted system were evaluated by the surgeons.
RESULTS:The total operation time and femoral osteotomy time of the trial group were significantly longer than those of the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the tibial osteotomy time and the amount of intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incisions of both groups healed by first intention after operation, and there was no infection around the prosthesis. Nine patients in the trial group and 8 in the control group developed lower extremity vascular thrombosis, all of which were calf intermuscular venous thrombosis, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 90 days. There was no significant difference in KSS score and WOMAC score between the two groups at 90 days after operation ( P>0.05). There was significant difference in the improvement rate of KSS score between the two groups ( P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of WOMAC score between the two groups ( P>0.05). Radiological results showed that the absolute errors of HKA and LDFA in the trial group were significantly smaller than those in the control group at 5 and 90 days after operation ( P<0.05), and the recovery accuracy of lower limb alignment was significantly higher than that in control group ( P<0.05). The absolute error of PTS in the trial group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at 5 days after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference at 90 days between the two groups ( P>0.05). The functional satisfaction rate of the robot-assisted system was 98.5% (65/66), and the satisfaction rates of stability and convenience were 100% (66/66).
CONCLUSION:Domestic robot-assisted TKA is a safe and effective surgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis, which can achieve favorable lower limb alignment reconstruction, precise implant of prosthesis, and satisfactory functional recovery.
