Effectiveness of proximal femur bionic nail for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.
10.7507/1002-1892.202305083
- Author:
Dongsong YANG
1
;
Qiong WANG
1
;
Zhonghao LUAN
2
;
Jiansheng LING
1
;
Peng CHEN
1
;
Xudong CHEN
1
;
Dongtao YUAN
1
;
Xiangzhou ZHEN
1
;
Junqiang WANG
3
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
2. Department of Information, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
3. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Intertrochanteric fracture;
internal fixation;
proximal femoral nail antirotation;
proximal femur bionic nail;
the elderly
- MeSH:
Humans;
Aged;
Retrospective Studies;
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary;
Bionics;
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Treatment Outcome;
Bone Nails;
Hip Fractures/surgery*;
Femur
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(10):1198-1204
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate effectiveness of proximal femur bionic nail (PFBN) in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly compared to the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).
METHODS:A retrospective analysis was made on 48 geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2020 and December 2022. Among them, 24 cases were treated with PFBN fixation after fracture reduction (PFBN group), and 24 cases were treated with PFNA fixation (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, gender, cause of injury, side and type of fracture, time from injury to operation, and preoperative mobility score, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Alzheimer's disease degree scoring, self-care ability score, osteoporosis degree (T value), and combined medical diseases between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of blood transfusions, transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, occurrence of complications, weight-bearing time after operation, and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, walking ability score, mobility score, self-care ability score were recorded and compared between the two groups. And the radiographic assessment of fracture reduction quality and postoperative stability, and fracture healing time were recorded.
RESULTS:The operations in both groups were successfully completed. All patients were followed up 6-15 months with an average time of 9.8 months in PFBN group and 9.6 months in PFNA group. The operation time was significantly longer in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, number of blood transfusions, transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, change in activity ability score, and change in self-care ability score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The weight-bearing time after operation was significantly shorter in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( P<0.05), and the postoperative VAS score and walking ability score were significantly better in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( P<0.05). Radiographic assessment showed no significant difference in fracture reduction scores and postoperative stability scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). All fractures healed and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly lower in PFBN group (16.7%, 4/24) than in PFNA group (45.8%, 11/24) ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Compared with PFNA, PFBN in the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures can effectively relieve postoperative pain, shorten bed time, reduce the risk of complications, and facilitate the recovery of patients' hip joint function and walking ability.
