Effectiveness of robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision for advanced thoracolumbar metastases.
10.7507/1002-1892.202305040
- Author:
Jiahong LI
1
;
Shu LIN
1
;
Liuyi TANG
1
;
Jiang HU
1
;
Lun WAN
1
;
Kun ZHANG
1
;
Weimin LIANG
1
;
Shan WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science, People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Orthopedic robot;
metastases;
minimal invasive surgery;
open surgery;
percutaneous fixation;
thoracolumbar spine
- MeSH:
Humans;
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Quality of Life;
Retrospective Studies;
Robotics;
Surgical Wound;
Decompression
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(9):1113-1118
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effectiveness of robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision in treatment of advanced thoracolumbar metastases.
METHODS:A clinical data of 57 patients with advanced thoracolumbar metastases admitted between June 2017 and January 2021 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases were treated with robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision (robot-guided group) and 31 cases with traditional open surgery (traditional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, lesion segment, primary tumor site, and preoperative Tokuhashi score, Tomita score, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Karnofsky score, and Frankel grading between groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, hospital stays, hospital expenses, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, blood transfusion, complications, and survival time were compared. The pedicle screw placement accuracy was evaluated according to the Gertzbein-Robbins grading by CT within 4 days after operation. The pain, function, and quality of life were evaluated by VAS score, ODI, Karnofsky score, and Frankel grading.
RESULTS:During operation, 257 and 316 screws were implanted in the robot-guided group and the traditional group, respectively; and there was no significant difference in pedicle screw placement accuracy between groups ( P>0.05). Compared with the traditional group, the operation time, hospital stays, duration of ICU stay were significantly shorter, and intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were significantly lesser in the robot-guided group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital expenses, blood transfusion rate, and complications between groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 8-32 months (mean, 14 months). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between groups at 7 days after operation ( P>0.05), but the robot-guided group was superior to the traditional group at 1 and 3 months after operation ( P<0.05). The postoperative ODI change was significantly better in the robot-guided group than in the traditional group ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the postoperative Karnofsky score change and Frankel grading change when compared to the traditional group ( P>0.05). Median overall survival time was 13 months [95% CI (10.858, 15.142) months] in the robot-guided group and 15 months [95% CI (13.349, 16.651) months] in the traditional group, with no significant difference between groups ( χ 2=0.561, P=0.454) .
CONCLUSION:Compared with traditional open surgery, the robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision can reduce operation time, hospital stays, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications in treatment of advanced thoracolumbar metastases.
