Relationship between Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Volume and Associated Immediate Outcome.
- Author:
Young Ho KHANG
1
;
Yong Ik KIM
;
Chang Yup KIM
;
Young Sung LEE
;
Sunmean KIM
;
Jin Seok LEE
;
Byung Hee OH
Author Information
1. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty;
Volume;
Outcome;
Risk Adjustment;
Quality of Care
- MeSH:
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary*;
Constriction, Pathologic;
Coronary Artery Bypass;
Emergencies;
Hospitalization;
Hospitals, High-Volume;
Hospitals, Low-Volume;
Humans;
Korea;
Medical Records;
Myocardial Infarction;
Risk Adjustment;
Risk Factors;
Transplants
- From:Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine
2001;34(1):9-20
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) volume and the associated immediate outcome. METHODS: A total of 1,379 PTCAs were performed in 25 hospitals in Korea between October 1 and December 31 in 1997. Data from 1,317 PTCAs (95.5%) were collected through medical record abstraction. Inter-observer reliability of the data was examined using the Kappa statistic on a subsample of 110 PTCA procedures from five hospitals. Intra-observer reliability of the data was also examined. PTCA success and immediate adverse outcomes were selected as the outcome variables. A successful PTCA was defined as a case that shows less than 50% diameter stenosis and more than 20% reduction of diameter stenosis. Immediate adverse outcomes included deaths during the same hospitalization, emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) within 24 hours after PTCA, and acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours after PTCA. The numbers of PTCAs performed in 1997 per hospital were used as the volume variables. RESULTS: Without adjusting for patient risk factors that may affect outcomes, procedures at high volume hospitals (200 cases per year) had a greater success rate (P=0.001) than low volume hospitals. There was a marginally significant difference (P=0.070) in major adverse outcome rates between high and low volume hospitals. After adjusting for risk factors, there were significant differences in procedural failure and major adverse outcome rates between high and low volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for patient clinical risk factors, the hospital volume of PTCA was associated with immediate outcomes. It is recommended that a PTCA volume per year be established in order to improve the immediate outcome of this procedure in Korea.
