Acupuncture for lumbar myofascial pain syndrome: systematic review and Meta-analysis.
10.13703/j.0255-2930.20221120-0002
- Author:
Ran ZHANG
1
;
Sheng-Yue WEN
2
;
Hong-Sheng ZHAN
2
;
Xun LIN
2
;
Min ZHANG
2
;
Jian PANG
2
;
Yue-Long CAO
2
;
Bo CHEN
3
Author Information
1. Shi's Medicine Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 201203, China. zhangran3011@163.com.
2. Shi's Medicine Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 201203, China.
3. Shi's Medicine Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 201203, China. cbm818@126.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Meta-analysis;
acupuncture;
lumbar myofascial pain syndrome;
systematic review
- MeSH:
Humans;
Piroxicam;
Acupuncture Therapy/methods*;
Pain;
Myofascial Pain Syndromes/therapy*;
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use*;
Lidocaine
- From:
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
2023;43(11):1324-1332
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
This study systematically reviewed the clinical efficacy of acupuncture for lumbar myofascial pain syndrome. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding acupuncture for lumbar myofascial pain syndrome were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, Scopus, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, VIP database, and China biomedical literature service system (SinoMed) from database inception until August 1st, 2022. The Cochrane's risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in all included studies, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis of the extracted data. As a result, 12 RCTs, involving 1 087 patients with lumbar myofascial pain syndrome, were ultimately included. The Meta-analysis results showed that the visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain in the observation group was lower than those in the oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication control [SMD=-1.67, 95%CI (-2.44, -0.90), Z=4.26, P<0.000 1] and other treatment control [low-frequency electrical stimulation, tuina, electromagnetic wave irradiation combined with piroxicam gel, SMD=-1.98, 95%CI (-2.48, -1.48), Z=7.74, P<0.000 01]. The pain rating index (PRI) score in the observation group was lower than those in the lidocaine injection control [MD=-2.17, 95%CI (-3.41, -0.93), Z=3.44, P=0.000 6] and other treatment control [low-frequency electrical stimulation, tuina, MD=-5.75, 95%CI (-9.97, -1.53), Z=2.67, P=0.008]. The present pain intensity (PPI) score in the observation group was lower than that in other treatment control [low-frequency electrical stimulation, tuina, MD=-1.04, 95%CI (-1.55, -0.53), Z=4.01, P<0.000 1]. In conclusion, compared with oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, low-frequency electrical stimulation, tuina, and electromagnetic wave irradiation combined with piroxicam gel, acupuncture is more effective in reducing pain in patients with lumbar myofascial pain syndrome; acupuncture also exhibites advantage over lidocaine injection in improving PRI score and showed better outcomes over tuina and low-frequency electrical stimulation in improving PRI and PPI scores.
