The diagnostic value of different methods for detecting constipation with defecation disorder based on Roman Ⅳ criteria

Xiaoyang Ren; Yan Yin; Xiaoni Yan; Yumei Luo; Yan Zhao; Yun Feng; Shuixiang HE

Return

The diagnostic value of different methods for detecting constipation with defecation disorder based on Roman Ⅳ criteria

VernacularTitle:不同检测方法对基于罗马Ⅳ标准的排便障碍型便秘的诊断价值
Author: Xiaoyang REN ¹ ; Yan YIN ¹ ; Xiaoni YAN ¹ ; Yumei LUO ¹ ; Yan ZHAO ¹ ; Yun FENG ¹ ; Shuixiang HE ¹
Author Information

1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: dyssynergic defecation constipation; constipation-related symptom; balloon expulsion test; anorectal manometry; colonic transit test
From: Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) 2022;43(6):867-871
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: 【Objective】 To study the diagnostic value of balloon expulsion test, anorectal manometry, and colonic transit test for detecting constipation with defecation disorders. 【Methods】 Outpatients with functional constipation were retrospectively analyzed and classified into dyssynergic defecation constipation and non-dyssynergic defecation constipation according to the Rome Ⅳ diagnostic criteria. We studied the differences in symptomatological characteristics and results of the three testing methods between the two groups of patients. 【Results】 Among the 48 patients with functional constipation included, there were 13 males (27.1%) and 35 females (72.9%) with an age of (44.8±12.3) years, including 32 patients (66.7%) with defecation disorder and 16 patients (33.3%) with non-defecation disorder. The percentage of anal distension was significantly higher in patients with dyssynergic defecation constipation than in those with non-dyssynergic defecation constipation (34.4% vs. 0.0%, P=0.021). All the three tests had diagnostic value for dyssynergic defecation constipation, but with low diagnostic agreement between the results of each test. The diagnostic sensitivity of anorectal manometry was 100%, but the specificity (56.3%) was low, and both the positive predictive value (82.1%) and the negative predictive value (100%) were higher; the diagnostic sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (81.3%) of the balloon expulsion test were both higher. The Youden index of colonic transit test was the smallest. The anal resting pressure and maximum systolic pressure of dyssynergic defecation constipation were lower than those of non-dyssynergic defecation constipation (75.2 mmHg vs. 97.1 mmHg, 168.7 mmHg vs. 251.6 mmHg). The two types of constipation did not significantly differ in anorectal pressure gradients during simulated defecation or rectal sensory function. 【Conclusion】 The balloon expulsion test can be used as a primary screening test for constipation with defecation disorders, and anorectal manometry has the highest comprehensive diagnostic value, but there is a certain false positive rate, and the colonic transit test has the lowest diagnostic efficacy. Thus a comprehensive analysis of the patient’s symptoms and the results of different tests is needed in clinical practice.