Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intraarticular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial

Swaroop S; Gupta P; Patnaik S; Reddy SS

Return

Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intraarticular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial

Author: Swaroop S ¹ ; Gupta P ² ; Patnaik S ¹ ; Reddy SS ¹
Author Information

1. Department of Orthopaedics, Siksha O Anusandhan Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India
2. Department of Orthopaedics, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, West Bromwich, United Kingdom
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: frozen shoulder, hydrodilatation shoulder, intra-articular steroids, adhesive capsulitis
From:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2023;17(No.1):34-39
CountryMalaysia
Language:English
Abstract: Introduction: Various non-operative treatment modalities have been advocated for a frozen shoulder. In the present study we compared the efficacy of single intra-articular steroid injection vs hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroids for frozen shoulder (FS) in the frozen phase. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomised control trial (RCT) done at a tertiary care centre. A total of 108 participants were randomised into two groupsone group received intra-articular steroid with hydrodilatation (HDS) and other group received intraarticular steroid injection only (S). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were taken, and statistical analysis was done to measure the outcome at two weeks, six weeks and three-month intervals after the injection. Result: There was significant improvement in symptoms at each interval for both the groups (p=0.0). There was no statistically significant difference in the SPADI score between the two groups at two weeks post injection, however at six weeks (p=0.04) and 3 months (p=0.001) significant difference in the SPADI score was demonstrated with better scores in group S. The mean duration of analgesia required in group HDS was 5.17 days (S.D.=1.73) and for group S was 4.28 days (S.D.=1.01), with a statistical significance (p=0.002). Conclusion: Better clinical results were obtained at six weeks and three months with the group receiving corticosteroid only and also had a lesser requirement of analgesia post-intervention. Thus, intra-articular steroid injection only seems to be a more desirable method of management during the frozen phase of FS than that of hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroid injection.