Clinical effect of cross positioning method for correcting low and moderate astigmatism during small incision lenticule extraction
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2024.2.23
- VernacularTitle:SMILE术中应用十字定位法矫正低中度散光的临床效果
- Author:
Wenjia CAO
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
;
Di SHEN
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
;
Jun CAI
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
;
Wei WEI
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
Author Information
1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Northwestern University
2. Xi'an No.1 Hospital
3. Shaanxi Institute of Ophthalmology
4. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology
5. Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmology Diseases of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an 710001, Shaanxi Province, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
vector analysis;
cross positioning method;
small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE);
myopic astigmatism
- From:
International Eye Science
2024;24(2):301-306
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of using the cross-positioning method for correcting low and moderate astigmatism during small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)surgery with Alpins vector analysis.METHODS: A total of 50 patients(81 eyes)with low and moderate astigmatism with the rule ≤1.50 D who underwent SMILE surgery at the laser myopia treatment center of Xi'an No.1 Hospital from May 2022 to November 2022 were included in the prospective randomized controlled study, and they were divided into two groups according to the random table, with 25 case(41 eyes)in cross-positioning group and 25 cases(40 eyes)in control group. In the cross-positioning group, the patients' head position was adjusted based on the cross intersection lines before the standard SMILE procedure, aligning the lateral canthi with the horizontal line and the midpoint of the eyebrows and the nose bridge with the vertical line. Postoperative visual acuity and refractive results at 3 mo were observed in both groups, and astigmatic changes were analyzed and evaluated using the Alpins vector analysis method.RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 6 cases(11 eyes)in the cross-positioning group were lost to follow-up, while in the control group, 8 cases(14 eyes)were lost to follow-up, with 19 cases(30 eyes)and 17 cases(26 eyes)finally included in the cross-positioning group and the control group, respectively. At 3 mo postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA)of both groups' operated eyes was ≥1.0, and no serious complications occurred, with no significant differences in UCVA, best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), spherical power, and spherical equivalent between the cross-positioning group and the control group(all P>0.05). The cylindrical power in the cross-positioning group was 0.00(0.00, 0.00)D, which was lower than -0.13(-0.50, 0.00)D in the control group(P=0.01). The vector analysis results showed that the difference vector(DV)in the cross-positioning group was lower than that in the control group [0.00(0.00, 0.00)vs 0.13(0.00, 0.50), P=0.01], and the index of success(IOS)was better than that of the control group [0.00(0.00, 0.00)vs 0.18(0.00, 0.77), P<0.01]. At 3 mo postoperatively, 26(87%)and 15(58%)eyes in the cross-positioning group and control groups achieved an angle of error(AE)within ±5°, respectively.CONCLUSION: The cross positioning method was used to calibrate the patients' head position during SMILE surgery, which reduced the axial position error and improved the accuracy of SMILE in correcting low and moderate astigmatism.
