Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of laboratory resource allocation in 14 blood stations based on entropy weight -TOPSIS method
10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2023.08.016
- VernacularTitle:基于熵权-TOPSIS法的14家血站实验室资源配置综合评价分析
- Author:
Weiping FENG
1
;
Zhifeng ZHANG
1
;
Jianhua LI
2
;
Feiyan ZHANG
3
;
Xiaoqiang DONG
4
;
Xiaogang LI
5
;
Yin HAN
6
;
Wenqing YUE
7
;
Yue YANG
8
;
Jun CUI
9
;
Lixia FENG
10
;
Qiang GAO
11
;
Caifeng HAN
12
;
Ran WANG
13
;
Jia CHENG
14
Author Information
1. Cansu Red Cross Blood Center, Lanzhou 730046, China
2. Baiyin Central Blood Station
3. Qingyang Central Blood Station
4. Dingxi Central Blood Station
5. Gannan Central Blood Station
6. Zhangye Central Blood Station
7. Wuwei Central Blood Station
8. Jiayuguan Central Blood Station
9. Linxia Central Blood Station
10. Jinchang Central Blood Station
11. Longnan Central Blood Station
12. Pinglinng Central Blood Station
13. Jiuquan Central Blood Station
14. Tianshui Central Blood Station
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
blood testing laboratory;
resource allocation;
entropy weight method;
TOPSIS method;
comprehensive evaluation;
Gansu province
- From:
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
2023;36(8):720-723
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
【Objective】 To investigate the resource allocation status of blood testing laboratories in 14 blood stations in Gansu Province, explore the impact of differences in basic conditions on the comprehensive testing ability of laboratories, so as to promote the homogenization and standardization of blood screening capacity in blood stations in Gansu and improve blood safety and effectivenes. 【Methods】 An evaluation index system of laboratory resource allocation was constructed and a question-naire was designed. The data of human resources, infrastructure and key equipment of 14 blood stations were collected. The entropy weight -TOPSIS method was used to evaluate and rank the resource allocation of 14 blood stations. 【Results】 In the comprehensive evaluation of blood testing laboratory resource allocation in 14 blood stations in Gansu, the top three were laboratories A, B and I, and the last three were laboratories G, M and J. On the whole, the main issue was unreasonable structure of human resources: most laboratories had unreasonable age structure; except for Laboratory A, there was no personnel with bachelor's degree or above in laboratories; most laboratories had not established a team with intermediate professional titles. In terms of infrastructure, the size of seven laboratories could not meet the needs of modern laboratory testing, and all eight blood stations had no spare nucleic acid laboratories nor a mutual spare laboratory with other blood stations As for the key equipment, 5 laboratories had no automatic blood grouping diagnostic instrument, 5 laboratories only had one set of enzyme immunoassay detection system, 3 laboratories had no spare equipment for the key equipment, which means if the equipment failure could not be repaired in time, the release of results would be affected. 【Conclusion】 There were significant differences in human resources, infrastructure and key equipment of blood testing laboratories in 14 blood stations in Gansu, which had a great impact on laboratory testing capacity and subsequent development. It is suggested that governments at all levels and health administrative departments optimize the input of laboratory resource allocation according to the blood collection volume of blood stations to gradually narrow the differences in resource distribution between different regions, improve the degree of laboratory automation and optimize the personnel structure, so as to build high-quality and efficient blood testing laboratories and ensure the safety of clinical blood use.
