Association between optic nerve sheath diameter/eyeball transverse diameter ratio and neurological outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Author:
Jinsung KIM
1
;
Hyungoo SHIN
;
Heekyung LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Clinical Article
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2023;66(6):664-671
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective:: The optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)/eyeball transverse diameter (ETD) ratio is a more reliable marker of intracranial pressure than the ONSD alone. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of the ONSD/ETD ratio (OER) for neurological outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).
Methods:: Adult patients with aSAH who visited the emergency department of a tertiary hospital connected to a South Korean university between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. Data on patient characteristics and brain computed tomography scan findings, including the ONSD and ETD, were collected using a predefined protocol. According to the neurological outcome at hospital discharge, the patients were divided into the unfavorable neurological outcome (UNO; cerebral performance category [CPC] score 3–5) and the favorable neurological outcome (FNO; CPC score 1–2) groups. The primary outcome was the association between the OER and neurological outcomes in patients with aSAH.
Results:: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, of whom 118 patients (69%) had UNO. Neither the ONSD (p=0.075) nor ETD (p=0.403) showed significant differences between the two groups. However, the OER was significantly higher in the UNO group in the univariate analysis (p=0.045). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the OER for predicting UNO was 0.603 (p=0.031). There was no independent relationship between the OER and UNO in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.010; p=0.576).
Conclusion:: The OER was significantly higher in patients with UNO than in those with FNO, and the OER was more reliable than the ONSD alone. However, the OER had limited utility in predicting UNO in patients with aSAH.
