Ethical Issues Referred to Clinical Ethics Support at a University Hospital in Korea: Three-Year Experience After Enforcement of LifeSustaining Treatment Decisions Act
10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e182
- Author:
Shin Hye YOO
1
;
Yejin KIM
;
Wonho CHOI
;
Jeongmi SHIN
;
Min Sun KIM
;
Hye Yoon PARK
;
Bhumsuk KEAM
;
Jae-Joon YIM
Author Information
1. Center for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2023;38(24):e182-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Clinical ethics support is a form of preventive ethics aimed at mediating ethicsrelated conflicts and managing ethical issues arising in the healthcare setting. However, limited evidence exists regarding the specific ethical issues in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the diverse ethical issues of cases referred to clinical ethics support after the new legislation on hospice palliative care and end-of-life decision-making was implemented in Korea in 2018.
Methods:A retrospective study of cases referred to clinical ethics support at a university hospital in Korea from February 2018 to February 2021 was conducted. The ethical issues at the time of referral were analyzed via qualitative content analysis of the ethics consultationrelated documents.
Results:A total of 60 cases of 57 patients were included in the study, of whom 52.6% were men and 56.1% were older than 60 years of age. The majority of cases (80%) comprised patients from the intensive care unit. One-third of the patients were judged as being at the end-of-life stage. The most frequent ethical categories were identified as goals of care/ treatment (78.3%), decision-making (75%), relationship (41.7%), and end-of-life issues (31.7%). More specifically, best interests (71.7%), benefits and burdens/harms (61.7%), refusal (53.3%), and surrogate decision-making (33.3%), followed by withholding or withdrawal (28.3%) were the most frequent ethical issues reported, which became diversified by year. In addition, the ethical issues appeared to differ by age group and judgment of the end-of-life stage.
Conclusion:The findings of this study expand the current understanding of the diverse ethical issues including decision-making and goals of care/treatment that have been referred to clinical ethics support since the enforcement of the new legislation in Korea. This study suggests a need for further research on the longitudinal exploration of ethical issues and implementation of clinical ethics support in multiple healthcare centers.
