Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and cortical thickness in the mandible: Analyzing differences between healthy men and women with cone-beam computed tomography
- Author:
Ingrid Garcia SANTOS
1
;
Fernanda Ramos de FARIA
;
Marcio José da Silva CAMPOS
;
Beatriz Álvares Cabral de BARROS
;
Gustavo Davi RABELO
;
Karina Lopes DEVITO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Articles
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry 2023;53(2):153-159
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The objective of this study was to assess the fractal dimension, lacunarity, trabecular microarchitecture parameters, and cortical linear measurements in the mandibles of male and female individuals to identify differences between them.
Materials and Methods:In total, 116 cone-beam computed tomography scans of healthy individuals of different ages (57 men and 59 women, aged between 20 and 60 years) were selected. The following bone parameters were measured: 1) buccal, lingual, and basal cortical bone thickness in 5 standard parasagittal sections (the midline, the left and right sides of the lower lateral incisors, and the left and right sides of the lower canines); 2) the bone volume fraction of 10 sequential axial sections from each patient by creating a volume of interest in the area between the lower canines; and 3) fractal dimension and lacunarity using grayscale images of the same region of the volume ofinterest in the anterior mandible. Spearman correlation coefficients and the Mann-Whitney test were used.
Results:A significant and positive correlation was found between age and cortical thickness, especially in the region of the central incisors. Significant differences between sexes in terms of fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone volume were found. Women revealed lower fractal dimension values and higher lacunarity and bone volume ratiovalues than men.
Conclusion:Fractal dimension, lacunarity, trabecular bone volume, and cortical thickness were different between men and women of different ages. (Imaging Sci Dent 2023; 53: 153-9)
