No abstract available.
Retrospective Studies*

No abstract available.
Retrospective Studies*

Authors retrospectively analyzed 22 cases of inferior oblique overaction, which were treated by means of infetior tlblique recession from May 1983 to June 1985. We compared preoperative and postoperative hyperdeviation in the primary position and adduction, and calculated the amount of corrected hyperdeviations in the prirrtary position and adduction pet millimeter of inferior oblique recession. The results were as follows: 1. The overall success rate was 84.4 % in primary inferior oblique overaction. 2. The amounts of correction in the primary position per millimeter of inferior oblique recession were 0.69 prism diopter. 3. The amounts of correction in adduction per millimeter of inferior oblique recession were 1.94 prism diopter. 4. Decrement amounts in adduction compared to in the primary position were 1.59 prism diopter per millimeter of inferior oblique recession.
Retrospective Studies

Although most available IOL power calculation formulas perform accurately for eyes of average axial length, they have been shown to be inaccurate for eyes that have unusually short and long axial length. To compare the prediction accuracy of new Hoffer Q with SRK-II formula, we reviewed, retrospectively, a series of 225 ECCE with PCL implantation cases, including 106 Hoffer Q group and 119 SRK-II group, each of which was further divided into subgroups based on axial length. The Hoffer Q formula overestimated the refraction and resulted in more myopic shift and was less accurate than SRK-II in all length eyes, except short length eyes. In short length eyes, both formulas had similar mean error and mean absolute error but Hoffer Q formula was more accurate than the SRK-II in +/- 0.5D prediction proportion.
Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although both radial- and convex-arrayed endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) scopes are widely used for observational EUS examinations, there have been few comparative studies on their power of visualization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capability of these EUS scopes for observation of the pancreatobiliary junction. METHODS: The rate of successful visualization of the pancreatobiliary junction was retrospectively compared between a radial-arrayed and a convex-arrayed echoendoscope, from a prospectively maintained database. Study periods were defined as January 2010 to December 2012 for the radial group, and February 2015 to October 2016 for the convex group because the respective scope was mainly used during those periods. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,660 cases with radial EUS and 1,984 cases with convex EUS were recruited. The success rates of observation of the pancreatobiliary junction were 80.0% and 89.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The capability of visualization of the pancreatobiliary junction in observational EUS was found to be better with a convex-arrayed than with a radial-arrayed echoendoscope.
Endosonography ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluated the clinical and radiological effectiveness of sacral alar screws for augmentation of S1 pedicle screws in long-level fusion including L5-S1 segment. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: The fusion rates of lumbosacral junction in long-level fusion are various when S1 pedicle screws are used without augmentation. But, reports of sacral alar screw augmentation are rare. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1996 to 2005, 63 patients performed more than two-level fusion including lumbosacral junction were reviewed. 47 patients underwent lumbosacral fusion with S1 pedicle screws only (S1 group), and 16 patients with sacral alar screws augmentation in addition to S1 pedicle screws (S1-2 group). Radiologically, bony union, halo sign, and breakage of implants were evaluated. Clinically, complications associated with screw placement and general complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Bony union was obtained in 56 cases(89%) at postoperative 4.3 months. Nonunion was observed in 7 cases(11%, S1 group:5, S1-2 group:2). Loosening of S1 pedicle screw was observed in 32 cases(89%) of S1 group and in 4 cases(25%) of S1-2 group. It showed statistical significance between two groups. Sacral alar screw loosening occurred in 8 cases(50%) of S1-2 group. Metal breakage was developed in 2 cases of S1 group without nonunion or loosening. Postoperative infection occurred in 7 cases(11%, S1 group:5, S1-2 group:2). CONCLUSIONS: Sacral alar screw augmentation was effective on protecting the loosening of S1 pedicle screw. Additional sacral alar screw can improve the rate of fusion for lumbosacral junction despite no statistical significance.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Succinates

Fifty-two patients with unstable cervical spine injuries underwent operations between January 1, 1990 to June 30, 1997 in our institution and this is retrospective study on clinical results about these patients. Patients with cervical instability resulted from injury posterior column, being included in White's criteria, were treated with Hafifax interlaminar clamps for cervical instability. We followed up forty-two cases for more than one year. All of the forty- two cervical fixations showed immediate and long term stability and there were no neurological complication. Neu rologic improvements were seen in thirty three, but thirteen cases were unchanged. These results indicate that Halifax interlaminar clamps are consider to be a safe and effective method for posterior stabilization of va rious causes of cervical spine instability.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine*

No abstract available.
Infarction* ; Retrospective Studies*

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic endonasal primary conjunctivodacryocysto-rhinostomy (CDCR) and revision CDCR after primary CDCR. METHODS: Twenty patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal CDCR with Jones tube and who were followed for over 6 months at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Our analysis included success rate, operation time and causes of failure. RESULTS: The indications for revision CDCR were prolapse of Jones tube and inadequate tube length. The initial success rate in the primary and revision groups was 78.6% (11/14) and 100% (6/6), respectively. Two initial failures in the primary group were later successful after revision. The mean operation time in the groups was 23.9 minutes ( +/- 6.3) and 21.7 minutes ( +/- 6.1), respectively. The main causes of failure included inaccurate tube length and abnormal tube position. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal CDCR appears to be a reasonable approach for revision, as well as primary, because of accurate measurement of Jones tube length during surgery and the shortened operation time.
Humans ; Prolapse ; Retrospective Studies

No abstract available.
Meconium* ; Retrospective Studies*