1.Prospective trial of taurolin irrigation in abdominoperineal resection.
Kyung Suk SUH ; Chang Shik YOO ; Sam Jae CHO ; Jae Gahb PARK
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 1992;8(1):29-33
No abstract available.
Prospective Studies*
2.Telesurgery is promising but still need proof through prospective comparative studies.
Michael STARK ; Emilio Ruiz MORALES ; Stefano GIDARO
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2012;23(2):134-135
No abstract available.
Prospective Studies
3.Strategies for Assuring Quality of Care under the DRG-based Prospective Payment System.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2000;43(6):517-521
No abstract available.
Prospective Payment System*
;
Prospective Studies*
4.DRG-based Prospective Payment System on the View of Clinician.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2000;43(6):506-510
No abstract available.
Prospective Payment System*
;
Prospective Studies*
7.Boomerang Effects from Medical Practice and Prospective for Future Designing of Medical Education.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2002;45(3):245-248
No abstract available.
Education, Medical*
;
Prospective Studies*
8.Pain Control with Continuous Infusion of Epidural Morphine and Bupivacaine after Lumbar Spinal Surgery(A Prospective Study).
Moon Soo SHIN ; Byung Hee LEE ; Hun Kyu CHOI ; Jae Sub NOH ; Jung Young AHN ; Seung Hun SHEEN ; Byung Hee LEE ; Bong Sub CHUNG
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2000;29(5):604-608
No abstract available.
Bupivacaine*
;
Morphine*
;
Prospective Studies*
10.How Effective Are Radiation Reducing Gloves in C-arm Fluoroscopy-guided Pain Interventions?.
Ah Na KIM ; Young Jae CHANG ; Bo Kyung CHEON ; Jae Hun KIM
The Korean Journal of Pain 2014;27(2):145-151
BACKGROUND: The physician's hands are close to the X-ray field in C-arm fluoroscopy-guided pain interventions. We prospectively investigated the radiation attenuation of Proguard RR-2 gloves. METHODS: In 100 cases, the effective doses (EDs) of two dosimeters without a radiation-reducing glove were collected. EDs from the two dosimeters-one dosimeter wrapped with a glove and the other dosimeter without a glove- were also measured at the side of the table (Group 1, 140 cases) and at a location 20 cm away from the side of the table (Group 2, 120 cases). Mean differences such as age, height, weight, radiation absorbed dose (RAD), exposure time, ED, and ratio of EDs were analyzed. RESULTS: In the EDs of two dosimeters without gloves, there were no significant differences (39.0 +/- 36.3 microSv vs. 38.8 +/- 36.4 microSv) (P = 0.578). The RAD (192.0 +/- 182.0 radcm2) in Group 2 was higher than that (132.3 +/- 103.5 radcm2) in Group 1 (P = 0.002). The ED (33.3 +/- 30.9 microSv) of the dosimeter without a glove in Group 1 was higher than that (12.3 +/- 8.8 microSv) in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The ED (24.4 +/- 22.4 microSv) of the dosimeter wrapped with a glove in Group 1 was higher than that (9.2 +/- 6.8 microSv) in Group 2 (P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the ratio of EDs (73.5 +/- 6.7% vs. 74.2 +/- 9.3%, P = 0.469) between Group 1 and Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Proguard RR-2 gloves have a radiation attenuation effect of 25.8-26.5%. The radiation attenuation is not significantly different by intensity of scatter radiation or the different RADs of C-arm fluoroscopy.
Fluoroscopy
;
Hand
;
Prospective Studies
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail