中文 | English
Return
Total: 587 , 1/59
Show Home Prev Next End page: GO
MeSH:(Mammography)

2.A Review of the Recent Monte Carlo (MC) Simulation for Dosimetry in Mammographic Applications

Zaker Salehi

Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2018;14(Supplement 1):76-81

3.Mammographic Radiation Dose Measurement.

Jeong Mi PARK

Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1999;41(2):413-417

4.Evaluation of Mean Glandular Dose and Modulation Transfer Function for Different Tube Potentials and Target-Filter Combinations in Computed Radiography Mammography

Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz ; Abdul Khaliq Mohd Saparudin, Ahmad Zaky Harun

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2013;20(3):23-30

5.Hormone replace therapy and changes in mammographic density in postmenopausal women.

Sang Bum SEO ; Keum Nahn JEE ; Jin Wan PARK

Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(2):411-417

6.Variable Causes of False-Negative Mammogram.

Eun Kyung KIM ; Mi Hye KIM ; Ki Keun OH ; Seung Ku LEE

Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1999;40(5):997-1002

8.Benign Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Malignant Calcifications.

Young Mook KIM ; Soo Young CHUNG ; Eun A CHUNG ; Suk Hyon KIM

Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1995;32(4):643-647

9.Benign Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Malignant Calcifications.

Young Mook KIM ; Soo Young CHUNG ; Eun A CHUNG ; Suk Hyon KIM

Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1995;32(4):643-647

10.Comparison Study of Image Quality of Direct and Indirect Conversion Digital Mammography System.

Hye Suk PARK ; Yuna OH ; Hee Jeong JO ; Sang Tae KIM ; Yu Na CHOI ; Hee Joung KIM

Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2010;21(3):239-245

Sort by Result Analysis

Display Mode

Output Records




File Type





Total: 587 , 1/59 Show Home Prev Next End page: GO