Objectives: . Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with chronic intermittent hypoxia and systemic inflammation, both of which contribute to vascular and metabolic complications. Monocytes, as key immune cells of innate immunity, have been implicated in this inflammatory state. However, the effect of OSA treatment on monocyte function and inflammatory phenotype remains poorly understood. Methods: . In this prospective cohort study, OSA patients were evaluated before and after 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Circulating monocytes were isolated, and inflammatory cytokine production (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-1β, and IL-6) was assessed at baseline and post-treatment, both at rest and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. Monocyte polarization (M1/M2-like marker expression) was measured by flow cytometry. Clinical severity parameters, including the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI), were correlated with immune changes. Results: . Following CPAP treatment, LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine secretion and LPS responsiveness, defined as the increase in cytokine levels upon stimulation, both declined after CPAP in proportion to baseline ODI, but not AHI. Apart from TNF-α, baseline IL-1β and IL-6 levels were below the quantifiable range of the assay, which precluded reliable comparison after treatment. This effect may be explained by a parallel post-treatment shift in monocyte phenotype toward an anti-inflammatory M2-like (CD163+CD206+) profile, as demonstrated by our flow cytometry data, which was also significantly associated with baseline ODI. Conclusion . CPAP alleviates systemic inflammation in OSA by reducing hypoxic burden and reprogramming monocytes toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype. The magnitude of immune modulation was more closely linked to ODI than AHI, suggesting that oxygen desaturation burden serves as a meaningful adjunct to AHI in assessing monocyte-driven immune dysregulation in OSA.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Neuropathic pain markedly impairs quality of life and imposes a substantial socioeconomic burden, while available treatments often provide only partial relief and are limited by safety concerns. The Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain (NeuPSIG-IASP) first published pharmacologic recommendations in 2007, followed by a major update in 2015 and a new guideline in 2025. This narrative review specifically compares the 2015 and 2025 NeuPSIG-IASP guidelines, outlining key methodological changes and therapeutic shifts. The 2025 guideline is based on a larger, more rigorous meta-analysis, maintains α2δ-ligands (adds mirogabalin), serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants as first-line drugs, downgrades tramadol into the opioid third-line group. It also introduces high-frequency motor-cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a weakly recommended third-line option and discusses implications for Korean clinical practice.

Background: Transthyretin amyloidosis, a protein-misfolding disorder characterized by systemic amyloid deposition, can be classified as wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) or hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv), depending on the presence of transthyretin (TTR) gene variants. We examined the genetic distribution of TTR variants in Korean patients diagnosed with ATTRv. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 801 participants who underwent TTR analysis at Samsung Medical Center from 2012 to 2024. The participants were categorized into two groups: in-house probands or relatives, and externally referred probands or relatives. Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic TTR variants were detected in 36 of 165 in-house probands (21.8%), among which D38A was the most frequent variant (50.0%; 18/36), followed by M13dup and E89K (8.3% each). Among referred probands, D38A was predominant (54.5%; 12/22), followed by M13dup (22.7%; 5/22). Cardiac amyloid involvement was the most common manifestation, observed in 97.2% (35/36) of in-house probands with ATTRv, followed by peripheral nervous system (PNS; 94.4%) and autonomic nervous system (ANS; 88.9%) involvement. In contrast, ANS involvement was most prevalent among in-house relatives who underwent organ evaluation (61.5%; 24/39), followed by cardiac (52.1%; 25/48) and PNS (48.7%; 19/39) involvement. Five of the eight in-house relatives harboring M13dup (62.5%) showed organ involvement, primarily in the ANS, supporting the pathogenicity of this variant. Conclusions This study provides the largest single-institution dataset of Korean patients with ATTRv, incorporating systematic organ assessments. The predominance of the unique TTR variants D38A and M13dup delineates a distinct genetic landscape that may facilitate accurate and timely diagnosis of ATTRv in the Korean population.

Korea’s healthcare system is at a critical juncture as rapid population aging, rising chronic disease burdens, and fragmented care expose the limits of a hospital-centered, fee-for-service model. Although policy discussions have long emphasized strengthening primary care and introducing a “family doctor” system, past reforms have focused mainly on expanding services or redefining professional roles, without establishing clear accountability, care continuity, or aligned payment mechanisms. Consequently, primary care remains weak and responsibility for comprehensive patient management is diffuse. This article argues that meaningful reform requires redefining the primary physician as an accountable manager of longitudinal, coordinated care within an integrated delivery and payment framework. Drawing on experiences from the United States, the United Kingdom, and several European countries, it identifies common features of successful primary care–oriented systems, including patient registration, team-based care, risk-adjusted payment, and explicit outcome accountability. Based on these insights, the authors propose a Korean primary physician model tailored to solo and small-group practices while fostering regional collaboration. Core elements include voluntary patient registration, multidisciplinary primary care teams, risk-stratified care management, regional care networks, and a mixed payment model combining per-member-per-month payments, shared savings, and performance-based incentives. The article emphasizes phased pilot testing focused on operational feasibility. Ultimately, transitioning to a primary care–centered system is presented as a strategic necessity for sustainability and improved care continuity.

South Korea’s current healthcare system stands at a critical crossroads that will determine whether it can progress in a better direction over the next decade. Behind the relatively stable level of population health that has been maintained until now, it has become clear that the deterioration of patient experiences, the risk of collapse in critical emergency medical services, the burnout of healthcare providers, and the crisis in the sustainability of healthcare finances have all accumulated simultaneously. This crisis can no longer be overcome by partial fixes or short-term measures alone. The answer to what needs to change first must begin with a reaffirmation of what the healthcare system should aim for. Ultimately, what needs to be changed now is not an individual policy, but the criteria and priorities through which we view healthcare. The focus must shift from what to provide more of, to questioning what holds greater social value. If such a shift does not begin now, in ten years we won’t face a better healthcare system, but care enmeshed in a deeper crisis. Now is precisely the time to fundamentally define the direction of the healthcare system.

Myopia, particularly high myopia, is a significant risk factor for several ocular pathologies including cataract, glaucoma, and retinal detachment. Excessive axial elongation associated with high myopia can induce biomechanical stretching, increasing the risk of serious complications like posterior staphyloma and myopic maculopathy. Global meta-analyses estimate that approximately 10 million people were visually impaired due to myopic maculopathy in 2015, with 3 million being blind. Recent nationwide surveys in South Korea revealed a prevalence of 65.4% for myopia and 6.9% for high myopia in children and adolescents, highlighting the urgent need for effective management. Delaying the onset and slowing the progression of myopia during childhood and adolescence is crucial for reducing the potential lifetime risk of these complications. This consensus statement, prepared by the Korean Myopia Society for the Korean Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (KAPOS), reviews the current evidence for myopia control interventions and provides management strategies applicable to the South Korean clinical setting. Key interventions covered include lifestyle modifications (outdoor time, near work adjustment), optical methods (myopia-control spectacle lenses, dual-focus soft contact lenses, orthokeratology), and pharmacologic treatment (low-concentration atropine), as well as combination therapies. The statement also addresses patient selection, treatment outcome evaluation using spherical equivalent and axial length changes, and the crucial aspects related to treatment cessation and the rebound effect.

Purpose: To evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes, including vessel morphology parameters on swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA), in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) switched to brolucizumab. Methods: This retrospective study included 37 eyes with nAMD that were switched from other anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents to intravitreal brolucizumab. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), injection intervals, central subfield thickness (CST), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), and presence of retinal fluid were compared between baseline and 12 months after switch. SS-OCTA images were analyzed to quantify macular neovascularization (MNV) area, vessel density, fractal dimension (FD), and lacunarity. Results: Switching to brolucizumab significantly extended injection intervals and reduced CST, PED height and retinal fluid, while maintaining BCVA at 12 months. Quantitative OCTA analysis showed reductions in MNV area and FD following the switch. When compared with the preceding 12 months of other anti-VEGF therapy, FD still showed a significant reduction after brolucizumab treatment (p = 0.019). Intraocular inflammation occurred in one eye and resolved with topical corticosteroids. Conclusions Intravitreal brolucizumab demonstrated favorable anatomical improvements and maintained visual outcomes over 12 months. Quantitative OCTA biomarkers, particularly FD, may serve as imaging indicators of disease activity and treatment response in eyes with nAMD undergoing a therapy switch.