Obstructive colorectal cancer is a common malignant bowel obstruction. Colostomy or colostomy following tumor resection may be the first choice for emergency surgery. The intestinal and systemic conditions of patients undergoing emergency surgery are often poor, and patients need to undergo multiple operations, which increase the surgical risk and economic burden and reduce the quality of life of patients. Poor intraoperative visualization may also affect the radical operation of emergency surgery. Transanal decompression tube (TDT) can rapidly decompress and drain the obstructed bowel, effectively relieve obstruction symptoms, and improve the success rate of primary radical resection. The TDT squeeze the tumor lightly, causing no spread of tumor cells, and is cheap, but the cavity of transanal decompression tube is small and easily blocked, and requires tedious flushing or regular replacement. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) can relieve intestinal obstruction effectively, provide sufficient preparation time for preoperative examination and improvement of nutritional status. By improving patient's tolerance to radical surgery, SEMS might be used as an important treatment strategy choice for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, SEMS may squeeze the tumor, leading to the spread of tumor cells, increase the recurrence rate and metastasis rate, and reduce the survival rate. Moreover, intestinal wall edema still existed during the operation following SEMS, and the rate of ostomy after anastomosis was as high as 34%. We hypothesized that prolonging the interval between stent insertion and surgery to 2 months, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered during this interval (SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy), would help improve outcomes. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment approach with a high laparoscopic resection rate, low stoma formation rate and improvement in the overall survival for patients with left-sided colon cancer obstruction. The patient physical status is improved, the primary tumor is downstaged, and intestinal wall edema is relieved during the relatively longer interval between SEMS placement and surgery. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy may be a preferred therapeutic strategy for obstructive left colon cancer.
Humans ; Quality of Life ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects* ; Colonic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Stents/adverse effects* ; Intestinal Obstruction/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Retrospective Studies

In order to evaluate the safety performance of self-expandable NiTi alloy stents systematically, the dynamic safety factor drawn up by International Organization for Standardization, was used to quantitatively reflect the safety performance of stents. Based on the constitutive model of super-elastic memory alloy material in Abaqus and uniaxial tensile test data of NiTi alloy tube, finite element method and experiments on accelerated fatigue life were carried out to simulate the self-expansion process and the shape change process under the action of high and low blood pressure for three -type stents of 8×30 mm, 10×30 mm, 12×30 mm. By analyzing the changes of stress and strain of self-expanding NiTi alloy stent, the maximum stress and strain, stress concentration position, fatigue strength and possible failure modes were studied, thus the dynamic safety factor of stent was calculated. The results showed that the maximum stress and plastic strain of the stent increased with the increase of grip pressure, but the maximum stress and strain distribution area of the stent had no significant change, which were all concentrated in the inner arc between the support and the connector. The dynamic safety factors of the three stents were 1.31, 1.23 and 1.14, respectively, which indicates that the three stents have better safety and reliability, and can meet the fatigue life requirements of more than 10 years, and safety performance of the three stents decreases with the increase of stent's original diameter.
Alloys ; Finite Element Analysis ; Nickel ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Stress, Mechanical ; Titanium

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Radiopaque metal markers are required to improve X-ray absorption by self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) to enable precise stent placement. A new tantalum radiopaque marker was recently developed using an ultrasonic spray technique. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and visibility of tantalum markers. METHODS: A total of three beagle dogs were used for a gastrointestinal tract absorption test. Five tantalum markers were placed in the stomach of each dog endoscopically. Excreted tantalum markers were collected, and their weights were compared to the original weights. In radiopacity tests, marker radiopacities on X-ray images were quantified using ImageJ software and compared with those of commercially available metal markers. Finally, the radiographic images of six patients who underwent biliary SEMS placement using tantalum marker Nitinol SEMSs (n=3) or gold marker Nitinol SEMSs (n=3) were compared with respect to marker brightness on fluoroscopic images. RESULTS: Absorption testing showed that the marker structures and weights were unaffected. Radiopacity tests showed that the mean brightness and total brightness scores were greater for tantalum markers (226.22 and 757, respectively) than for gold (A, 209 and 355, respectively; B, 204.96 and 394, respectively; C, 194.34 and 281, respectively) or platinum markers (D, 203.6 and 98, respectively). On fluoroscopic images, tantalum markers had higher brightness and total brightness scores (41.47 and 497.67, respectively) in human bile ducts than gold markers (28.37 and 227, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tantalum markers were found to be more visible than other commercially available markers in X-ray images and to be resistant to gastrointestinal absorption.
Absorption ; Animals ; Bile Ducts ; Dogs ; Gastrointestinal Absorption ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Humans ; Platinum ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Stents ; Stomach ; Tantalum ; Ultrasonics ; Weights and Measures

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Metallic stents designed to relieve malignant biliary obstruction are susceptible to occlusive tumor ingrowth or overgrowth. In a previous report, we described metallic stents covered with paclitaxel-incorporated membrane (MSCPM-I, II) to prevent occlusion from tumor ingrowth via antitumor effect. This new generation paclitaxel-eluting biliary stent is further endowed with sodium caprate (MSCPM-III) for enhanced drug delivery. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety of its drug delivery system in the porcine biliary tract. METHODS: MSCPM-III (10% [wt/vol] paclitaxel) and covered metal stents (CMSs) were endoscopically inserted in porcine bile ducts in vivo. Histologic biliary changes, levels of paclitaxel released, and various serum analytes (albumin, alkaline phosphate, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, total protein, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin) were assessed. RESULTS: Based on the intensity of reactive inflammation and fibrosis, changes in porcine biliary epithelium secondary to implanted MSCPM-III were deemed acceptable (i.e., safe). Histologic features in the MSCPM-III and CMS groups did not differ significantly. In a related serum analysis, paclitaxel release from MSCPM-III stents was below the limit of detection for 28 days. Biochemical analyses were also similar for the two groups, and no evidence of hepatic or renal toxicity was found in animals receiving MSCPM-III stents. CONCLUSIONS: In a prototypic porcine trial, this newly devised metal biliary stent incorporating both paclitaxel and sodium caprate appears to be safe in the porcine bile duct.
Alanine Transaminase ; Animals ; Aspartate Aminotransferases ; Bile Ducts ; Biliary Tract Neoplasms ; Biliary Tract ; Bilirubin ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Epithelium ; Fibrosis ; Inflammation ; Limit of Detection ; Membranes ; Paclitaxel ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Sodium ; Stents

Nitinol self expandable metal stents are increasingly utilised for malignant obstruction in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. We describe a case in which repeated fracture of proximal duodenal stents with dissolution of the nitinol wire skeleton and covering membranes occurred in a long term cancer survivor. This necessitated placement of 4 stents for symptom control and to allow oral feeding until the patient's death 20 months after the initial stent was inserted. Fracture of gastric and duodenal stents has rarely been described previously, some incidences of which were considered due to mechanical causes. Dissolution of stent metal skeletons has not previously been recognised in gastroduodenal stents but has been described in an oesophageal stent subject to reflux of gastric content and a biochemical mechanism has been proposed. With modern oncological treatment the prospect of patients outliving their stents is increasing and the need for repeat procedures should form part of the consent process.
Gastric Outlet Obstruction ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Humans ; Incidence ; Membranes ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiology, Interventional ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Skeleton ; Stents ; Survivors

Biliary drainage is required for the management of unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO), and endoscopic transpapillary drainage is the first-line therapy because it is less invasive. Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are superior to plastic stents because they have longer stent patency and are more cost-effective. Endoscopic bilateral SEMS placement is technically challenging compared to unilateral placement. However, recent developments in devices and techniques have facilitated bilateral SEMS placement. There are two methods for bilateral hilar SEMS placement for UMHBO: side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent (SIS). Sequential SBS was commonly conducted for bilateral hilar SEMS placement. In a new and thinner delivery system that was developed for SEM placement, two SEMSs could be simultaneously inserted and deployed through the working channel. This new bilateral stenting method enabled us to accomplish simultaneous SBS placement, which increased the success rate of SBS. Insertion of the guidewire and delivery of the second SEMS through the mesh of the first SEMS is challenging in SIS. Newly designed or modified SEMSs that are suitable for SIS have been developed to overcome this challenge, and these SEMSs have facilitated SIS. Uncovered SEMS has been commonly used for hilar SEMS placement, but covered SEMS (CSEMS) is another option for hilar SEMS placement, because CSEMS prevents tumor ingrowth and allows for removal of the stent for re-intervention. Therefore, CSEMS can be used for bilateral SEMS placement in SBS. There are many methods and kinds of SEMS available for bilateral SEMS placement. However, due to lack of evidence, there is no consensus on whether SBS or SIS is optimal for bilateral hilar SEMS placement. In this review, we compared various outcomes between SBS and SIS from previous studies, to clarify which method is better for bilateral SEMS placement for UMHBO.
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholestasis ; Consensus ; Drainage ; Klatskin Tumor ; Methods ; Plastics ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Stents

Placement of a plastic or metal stent via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) currently serves as the first-line procedure for obstructive jaundice and acute cholangitis. Dysfunction of the biliary stent causes recurrence of symptoms and often requires reinterventions and hospitalizations. Therefore, duration of stent patency is commonly used as the primary endpoint in clinical studies of biliary stents. However, owing to considerable heterogeneity between studies in reporting of biliary stent patency, it has been difficult to compare and integrate results of independent studies. There has been between-study heterogeneity in definitions of stent patency, statistics reported for survival curves of stent patency, and methods to treat censored cases. In addition to stent occlusion, stent migration is a major cause of recurrent biliary obstruction after covered metal stent placement, which further complicates the reporting of stent patency. Reporting of functional success and adverse events has been also inconsistent between the studies. From the perspective of evidence-based medicine, the variations in the definitions of outcome variables potentially hinder robust meta-analyses. To overcome the issues due to the lack of outcome reporting guidelines on the topic, the TOKYO criteria 2014 for reporting outcomes associated with endoscopic transpapillary placement of biliary stents have been proposed. Due to their comprehensiveness, the TOKYO criteria can be readily utilized to evaluate various types of biliary stent placement using ERCP, irrespective of types of stents and location of biliary stricture. In this article, we review the TOKYO criteria as a standardized reporting system for endoscopically-placed biliary stents. We also discuss potential controversial issues in the application of the TOKYO criteria. Given that endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage is increasingly utilized for cases with failed ERCP or altered gastrointestinal anatomy, we further propose a potential application of the TOKYO criteria to reporting of outcomes of this procedure.
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholangitis ; Common Bile Duct ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Drainage ; Endosonography ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Hospitalization ; Jaundice, Obstructive ; Plastics ; Population Characteristics ; Recurrence ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Stents

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement is challenging, many recent studies have reported promising outcomes regarding technical success and endoscopic re-intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the technical accessibility of stent-in-stent placement using large cell-type stents in patients with inoperable malignant hilar biliary obstruction. METHODS: Forty-three patients with inoperable malignant hilar biliary obstruction from four academic centers were prospectively enrolled from March 2013 to June 2015. RESULTS: Bilateral stent-in-stent placement using two large cell-type stents was successfully performed in 88.4% of the patients (38/43). In four of the five cases with technical failure, the delivery sheath of the second stent became caught in the hook-cross-type vertex of the large cell of the first stent, and subsequent attempts to pass a guidewire and stent assembly through the mesh failed. Functional success was achieved in all cases of technical success. Stent occlusion occurred in 63.2% of the patients (24/38), with a median patient survival of 300 days. The median stent patency was 198 days. The stent patency rate was 82.9%, 63.1%, and 32.1% at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Endoscopic re-intervention was performed in 14 patients, whereas 10 underwent percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Large cell-type stents for endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement had acceptable functional success and stent patency when technically successful. However, the technical difficulty associated with the entanglement of the second stent delivery sheath in the hook-cross-type vertex of the first stent may preclude large cell-type stents from being considered as a dedicated standard tool for stent-in-stent placement.
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic ; Drainage ; Humans ; Klatskin Tumor ; Prospective Studies* ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Stents*

Surgery has been the standard treatment for perforated duodenal ulcers, with mostly good results. However, the resolution of postoperative leakage after primary repair of perforated duodenal ulcer remains challenging. There are several choices for re-operation required in persistent leakage from perforated duodenal ulcers. However, many of these choices are complicated surgical procedures requiring prolonged general anesthesia that may increase the chances of morbidity and mortality. Several recent reports have demonstrated postoperative leakage after primary repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer treated with endoscopic insertion using a covered self-expandable metallic stent, with good clinical results. We report a case with postoperative leakage after primary repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer treated using a covered self-expandable metallic stent.
Anesthesia, General ; Duodenal Ulcer* ; Mortality ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Stents*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dysphagia is encountered in a large proportion of patients with lung cancer and is associated with malnutrition and a poor quality of life. This study compared the clinical outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion and percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) feeding for patients with lung cancer and dysphagia. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with lung cancer, who underwent either SEMS insertion (stent group) or PG (gastrostomy group) as an initial treatment procedure for dysphagia between July 1997 and July 2015 at the Samsung Medical Center, were reviewed retrospectively, and 84 patients with esophageal obstruction were identified. The clinical outcomes, including the overall survival, additional intervention, complications, and post-procedural nutritional status in the two groups, were compared. RESULTS: Among the 84 patients finally analyzed, 68 patients received SEMS insertion and 16 had PG. The stent group had less cervical obstruction and more mid-esophageal obstruction than the gastrostomy group. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed similar overall survival in the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the two modalities had similar survival rates (PG compared with SEMS insertion, hazard ratio 0.682, p=0.219). Fifteen patients (22.1%) in the stent group received additional intervention, whereas there was no case in the gastrostomy group (p=0.063). The decrease in the serum albumin level after the procedure was lower in the gastrostomy group than in the stent group (-0.20±0.54 g/dL vs. -0.65±0.57 g/dL, p=0.013) CONCLUSIONS: SEMS insertion and PG feeding for relieving dysphagia by lung cancer had a comparable survival outcome. On the other hand, PG was associated with a better nutritional status.
Deglutition Disorders* ; Esophageal Stenosis ; Gastrostomy* ; Hand ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms* ; Lung* ; Malnutrition ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nutritional Status ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents ; Serum Albumin ; Stents* ; Survival Rate