ABSTRACT The main aim of orbital fracture reconstruction is to restore the functional and aesthetic components of the eye. However, it is known that surgery for complex three-dimensional anatomy of the orbit is always a challenge. With recent advancements in technology, surgical predictability and outcomes have greatly improved. Several methods for orbital reconstruction surgery have been documented such as virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation, intraoperative imaging, and the use of patient-specific implant (PSI). PSI made of titanium can be designed by using a computer-aided design process and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) of CT-scan routinely used during diagnostic imaging. With precise analyses in shape and size followed by personalised implant design, the surgical precision can be alleviated further and at the same time, the surgical duration could be reduced with anticipation of better surgical outcomes. However, meticulous planning needs to be done preoperatively, with the timing of the surgery being an important factor. In the present case, pure orbital blowout fracture primarily treated with a personalised-implant solution derived from 3D-printing technology is described. Both pre-surgical and surgical workflow of this computer-assisted surgical method is elaborated. PSI for primary orbital reconstruction can be regarded as a viable alternative surgical solution including its working timeframe and adherence to the surgical protocol or algorithm.
Orbital Fractures--surgery ; Orbital Implants

ABSTRACT Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) has been previously described and acknowledged for its use in orbital blowout fracture reconstructions. We described a clinical case series managed by this technique combined with intraoperative image fusion for accuracy in orbital implant position. In total, eight patients who sustained a total number of 19 orbital wall fractures were described. From the total number of 19 blowout orbital fracture reconstructions comprised of medial and inferior (floor) orbital fractures, malposition was identified in a total of four orbital implants by using image fusion. All cases of implant malposition were immediately revised intraoperatively. Subsequent fusion was carried out to confirm whether the revision was satisfactorily achieved. We found that the intraoperative image fusion technique utilised to determine orbital implant position, especially at the posterior ledge, further augmented the role of intraoperative CT scanning. Image fusion conceptually provides an immediate, real-time, and objective solution for intraoperative image analysis and potentially eliminates problems with misaligned CT images. It also reduces the need for the surgeon to ‘eye-ball’ the CT images acquired or the need for additional intraoperative time, since the patient’s head orientation is always axially at random during the acquisition of the CT. Conventional methods for CT image assessment are subjected to one’s own interpretation and may introduce inconsistent or longer intraoperative decision-making. The technique facilitates intraoperative decision-making and reduces the risk of orbital implant malposition in orbital blowout fracture reconstructions. Hence, surgical complication in relation to orbital implant malposition in orbital blowout fracture management could be minimised. In addition, no further postoperative imaging is required.
Orbital Fractures ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND: The big data provided by Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) contains data from nearly all Korean populations enrolled in the National Health Insurance Service. We aimed to identify the incidence of facial fractures and its trends in Korea using this big data from HIRA.METHODS: We used the Korean Standard Classification of Disease and Cause of Death 6, 7 for diagnosis codes. A total of 582,318 patients were included in the final analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software and SPSS software.RESULTS: The incidence of facial fractures consistently declined, from 107,695 cases in 2011 to 87,306 cases in 2016. The incidence of facial fractures was the highest in June 2011 (n = 26,423) and lowest in January 2014 (n = 10,282). Nasal bone fractures were the most common, followed by orbit and frontal sinus fractures. The percentage of nasal bone fractures declined, whereas those of orbital fractures increased from 2011 to 2016 (P < 0.001). Among orbital fractures, inferior wall fractures were the most common, followed by medial wall fractures. Among mandibular fractures, angle fractures were the most common, followed by condylar process and symphysis fractures. Although it was difficult to predict the most common type of zygomatic and maxilla fractures, their incidence consistently declined since 2011.CONCLUSION: We observed trends in facial fractures in Korea using big data including information for nearly all nations in Korea. Therefore, it is possible to predict the incidence of facial fractures. This study is meaningful in that it is the first study that investigated the incidence of facial fractures by specific type.
Cause of Death ; Classification ; Diagnosis ; Facial Bones ; Fractures, Bone ; Frontal Sinus ; Humans ; Incidence ; Insurance, Health ; Korea ; Mandibular Fractures ; Maxilla ; Nasal Bone ; National Health Programs ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures

Orbital blowout fracture is a common result of facial trauma and is observed more frequently now than in the past as a result of introduction of computed tomography and increased incidence of high-energy impact injuries. Because orbital fracture may be associated with prolapse of the orbital contents into the paranasal sinuses, which results in sequelae such as diplopia and enophthalmos, proper diagnosis and timing of repair are crucial. However, clinical decision-making in the management of patients with orbital blowout fractures is challenging, and various aspects of orbital fracture management are uncertain. Numerous approaches have been used for reduction of blowout fracture. Controversies exist regarding indications for surgery, timing of surgery, and optimal reconstruction material. Recently, with expanding use of and indications for endoscopy in orbital blowout fracture surgery, otolaryngologists participate more often in facial trauma surgery, including blowout fracture. In this review, several controversial issues of surgical indication, surgical timing, method of approach, and choice of reconstruction material are discussed from the perspective of otolaryngology surgeons.]]>
Clinical Decision-Making ; Diagnosis ; Diplopia ; Endoscopy ; Enophthalmos ; Humans ; Incidence ; Methods ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Otolaryngology ; Paranasal Sinuses ; Prolapse ; Surgeons

Most orbital surgeons believe that it's difficult to restore the primary orbital wall to its previous position and that the orbital wall is so thin that cannot be firmly its primary position. Therefore, orbital wall fractures generally have been reconstructed by replacing the bony defect with a synthetic implant. Although synthetic implants have sufficient strength to maintain their shape and position in the orbital cavity, replacement surgery has some drawbacks due to the residual permanent implants. In previous studies, the author has reported an orbital wall restoring technique in which the primary orbital wall fragment was restored to its prior position through a combination of the transorbital and transantral approaches. Simple straight and curved elevators were introduced transnasally to restore the orbital wall and to maintain temporary extraorbital support in the maxillary and ethmoid sinus. A transconjunctival approach provided sufficient space for implant insertion, while the transnasal approach enabled restoration of the herniated soft tissue back into the orbit. Fracture defect was reduced by restoring the primary orbital wall fragment to its primary position, making it possible to use relatively small size implant, furthermore, extraorbital support from both sinuses decreased the incidence of implant displacement. The author could recreate a natural shape of the orbit with the patient's own orbital bone fragments with this dual approach and effectively restored the orbital volume and shape. This procedure has the advantages for retrieving the orbital contents and restoring the primary orbital wall to its prior position.
Elevators and Escalators ; Enophthalmos ; Ethmoid Sinus ; Incidence ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Surgeons

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors for recovery time in patients with orbital fracture with diplopia through analysis of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) images and postoperative recovery time. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed CT findings-preoperative: fracture size, type of fracture, fracture site, extraocular muscle (EOM) swelling, EOM and soft tissue injury, and the amount of soft tissue herniation; post-operative: degree of enophthalmos, and diplopia recovery period in 379 patients who underwent surgical treatment for orbital fracture between March 2006 and December 2015. RESULTS: The average postoperative follow-up period was 556.2 ± 59.5 days, and the mean duration of recovery was 23.9 ± 42.5 (range, 3–186) days. The recovery time of diplopia was significantly increased with the following preoperative CT findings: fracture size (small and medium < large) (p = 0.049), type of fracture (linear < hinge < comminuted, trap-door) (p < 0.01), fracture site (inferior < medial and both) (p < 0.01), EOM and soft tissue injury (prolapse and torsion, muscle entrapment, kinked muscle) (p < 0.01), and the amount of soft tissue herniation (small and medium < large) (p < 0.001). The mechanism of injury, sex, age, and the degree of enophthalmos were not related to the length of the diplopia recovery period. CONCLUSIONS: The length of diplopia recovery could be predicted by CT findings.
Diplopia ; Enophthalmos ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Retrospective Studies ; Soft Tissue Injuries

The ‘white-eyed’ blowout fracture is an orbital injury in children that is often initially misdiagnosed as a head injury because of predominant autonomic features and lack of soft tissue signs. Delays in treatment can lead to morbidity. It has been recommended that children who present with a ‘white-eyed’ blowout fracture should have surgery performed within 48 hours of diagnosis, otherwise prognosis is poor. We present a 12-year-old boy who was initially misdiagnosed with a head injury due to the minor appearance of his orbital injury and his presenting complaints of nausea and vomiting.
Brain Concussion ; Child ; Craniocerebral Trauma ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Male ; Nausea ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Prognosis ; Vomiting

PURPOSE: Primary reconstruction via transconjunctival approach is a standardized treatment option for orbital floor fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the findings of specific ophthalmologic assessment with the patient's complaints after fracture reduction. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart analysis was performed on patients who had undergone transconjunctival orbital floor fracture reduction for fracture therapy with resorbable foil (ethisorb sheet or polydioxanone foil). A follow-up assessment including ophthalmological evaluation regarding visual acuity (eye chart projector), binocular visual field screening (Bagolini striated glasses test) and diplopia (cover test, Hess screen test) was conducted. Additionally, a questionnaire was performed to assess patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with a mean follow-up of 23 months (ranging from 11 to 72) after surgical therapy were included. Diplopia was present preoperatively in 23 (43.4%) and reduced in follow-up examination (n = 12, 22.6%). Limitations in ocular motility reduced from 37.7% to 7.5%. The questionnaire about the patient's satisfaction revealed excellent outcomes in relation to the functional and esthetical parameters. CONCLUSION Transconjunctival approach is a safe approach for orbital fracture therapy. Postoperative diplopia is nearly never perceptible for the individual and differs to pathologic findings in the ophthalmic assessment.
Cohort Studies ; Diplopia ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation ; methods ; Orbital Fractures ; complications ; physiopathology ; psychology ; surgery ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Satisfaction ; Polydioxanone ; administration & dosage ; Polyglycolic Acid ; administration & dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity ; Visual Fields

BACKGROUND: To date, a variety of surgical approaches have been used to reconstruct the medial orbital wall fracture. Still however, there is still a controversy as to their applicability because of postoperative scars, injury of anatomical structures and limited visual fields. The purpose of this study was to introduce a useful additional medial subbrow approach for better reduction and securement more accurate implant pocket of medial orbital wall fracture with the subciliary technique. METHODS: We had performed our technique for a total of 14 patients with medial orbital wall fracture at our medical institution between January 2016 and July 2017. All fractures were operated through subciliary technique combined with the additional medial subbrow approach. They underwent subciliary approach accompanied by medial wall dissection using a Louisville elevator through the slit incision of the medial subbrow procedure. This facilitated visualization of the medial wall fracture site and helped to ensure a more accurate pocket for implant insertion. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes showed sufficient coverage without displacement. Twelve cases of preoperative diplopia improved to two cases of postoperative diplopia. More than 2 mm enophthalmos was 14 cases preoperatively, improving to 0 case postoperatively. Without damage such as major vessels or extraocular muscles, enophthalmos was corrected and there was no restriction of eyeball motion. CONCLUSION: Our ancillary procedure was useful in dissecting the medial wall, and it was a safe method as to cause no significant complications in our clinical series. Also, there is an only nonvisible postoperative scar. Therefore, it is a recommendable surgical modality for medial orbital wall fracture.
Cicatrix ; Diplopia ; Elevators and Escalators ; Enophthalmos ; Fracture Fixation ; Humans ; Methods ; Muscles ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Visual Fields

BACKGROUND: The conventional surgical method for reconstructing orbital floor fractures involves restoration of orbital continuity by covering an onlay with a thin material under the periorbital region. However, in large orbital floor fractures, the implant after inserting is often dislocated, leading to malposition. This study aimed to propose a novel implanting method and compare it with existing methods. METHODS: Among patients who underwent surgery for large orbital floor fractures, 24 who underwent the conventional onlay implanting method were compared with 21 who underwent the novel γ implanting method that two implant sheets were stacked and bent to resemble the shape of the Greek alphabet γ. When inserting a γ-shaped implant, the posterior ledge of the orbital floor was placed between the two sheets and the bottom sheet was impacted onto the posterior wall of the maxilla to play a fixative role while the top sheet was placed above the residual orbital floor to support orbital contents. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analyses. RESULTS: Compared to the conventional onlay method, the gamma method resulted in better restoration of orbital contents, better improvement of enophthalmos, and fewer revision surgeries. CONCLUSION: Achieving good surgical outcomes for extended orbital floor fractures is known to be difficult. However, better surgical outcomes could be obtained by using the novel implantation method of impacting a γ-shaped porous polyethylene posteriorly.
Enophthalmos ; Humans ; Inlays ; Maxilla ; Methods ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Orbital Implants ; Polyethylene ; Statistics as Topic