1.Techniques for studying the great auricular nerve conduction.
Geun Yeol JO ; Young Ill KOO ; In sun PARK
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(1):130-133
No abstract available.
Neural Conduction*
2.Posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction study and a case report.
Yong Hyun NAM ; Won Hee SUH ; In Young SEONG
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(1):100-104
No abstract available.
Neural Conduction*
3.An experimental study for standardization of F wave in motor nerve conduction.
Tai Ryoon HAN ; Sun Gun CHUNG ; Jong Min LEE
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1991;15(3):323-333
No abstract available.
Neural Conduction*
4.Saphenous nerve conduction study: antidromic vs orthodromic.
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1991;15(4):489-492
No abstract available.
Neural Conduction*
5.Factors affecting diabetic neuropathy and significance of nerve conduction study.
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(4):578-584
No abstract available.
Diabetic Neuropathies*
;
Neural Conduction*
6.Nerve conduction studies of anterior interosseous nerve in healthy adults.
Jae Ho SHIM ; Joong Sun CHON ; Sae Il CHUN ; Jung Soon SHIN
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1991;15(4):465-470
No abstract available.
Adult*
;
Humans
;
Neural Conduction*
7.Suction cup electrode in motor nerve conduction study.
Sae Yoon KANG ; Ki Eon JANG ; Eun CHOI
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1991;15(4):459-464
No abstract available.
Electrodes*
;
Neural Conduction*
;
Suction*
9.Some characteristics of the conduction index of peripheral nerve system in healthy subjects from 17-40 of ages
Journal of Vietnamese Medicine 1999;232(1):43-49
The study was carried out in 100 healthy subjects (60 males and 40 females) with age from 17-40. The investigative parameters of the conduction index in the peripheral nerve system were: nerve conduction velocity (NCV) of median, ulnar, common peroneal, posterior tibial, sural nerves and the latency of Hoffmann reflex. The result are following: NCV of median nerve was 59.345.98m/s, ulnar nerve was 59.586.08m/s, common peroneal nerve was 52.065.67m/s, posterior tibial nerve was 49.735.89m/s, sural nerve was 48.335.59m/s and latency of Hoffmann reflex was 28.152.57m/s.
Peripheral Nervous System
;
Neural Conduction
10.The Influence of Stimulation Site on the Conduction Study of Palmar Cutaneous Branch of Median Nerve.
Hyunmee AN ; Sangok PARK ; Hyun Dong KIM
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002;26(1):46-49
OBJECTIVE: Nerve conduction study of palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve is infrequently evaluated in spite of its importance because of perceived technical difficulties. This study reports the different nerve conduction responses of palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve by change of stimulation site. METHOD: Conduction study of palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve was performed in 42 normal individuals stimulated at the site of 7 cm proximal to the recording electrode. Results were compared to those of stimulated at the site of 10 cm proximal to the recording electrode with t-test by SPSS 7.5. RESULTS: Values of conduction study stimulated at the site of 10 cm proximal to the recording electrode were 2.37+/-0.48 msec (mean+/-SD) for peak latency, 15.67+/-8.31 micro V for amplitude and 34.52+/-5.97 mA for supramaximal intensity.Those values stimulated at 7 cm proximal were 1.72+/-0.33 msec for peak latency, 24.48+/-11.41 micro V for amplitude and 12.82+/-2.18 mA for supramaximal intensity. Amplitude stimulated at the site of 7 cm was significantly larger than that stimulated at the site of 10 cm (p<0.01). Supramaximal intensity stimulated at the site of 7 cm was significantly smaller than that stimulated at 10 cm (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The different stimulation site influences on the nerve conduction study of the palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve. Conduction study of palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve with stimulation at 7 cm proximal is a more reliable and convenient method compared to 10cm proximal in respect of larger amplitude and smaller supramaximal intensity.
Electrodes
;
Median Nerve*
;
Neural Conduction