Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. By integrating multimodal data, including demographic, psychosocial, and neuroimaging information, we sought to en-hance early detection of cognitive decline. Methods: Data were obtained from 159 participants in the Biobank Innovations for Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease with Alzheimer’s Disease Study. Participants underwent clinical assessments, neuropsychological testing, and magnetic resonance im-aging scans. Cognitive decline was defined as an increase in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes of greater than 2.05 points per year at follow-up. Models were developed using the logistic classification, combining demographic, psychosocial as-sessments, and neuroimaging data. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1 score, while Shapley additive explanation values were used to assess feature importance. Results: The model that incorporated all data types achieved the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.834. The top predictor of cognitive decline was years of education, underscoring the importance of non-invasive, easily accessible data for prediction. Conclusion This machine learning model demonstrates significant potential for early cognitive decline prediction, offering a scalable tool for improving dementia screening and timely intervention, especially in resource-limited settings.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. By integrating multimodal data, including demographic, psychosocial, and neuroimaging information, we sought to en-hance early detection of cognitive decline. Methods: Data were obtained from 159 participants in the Biobank Innovations for Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease with Alzheimer’s Disease Study. Participants underwent clinical assessments, neuropsychological testing, and magnetic resonance im-aging scans. Cognitive decline was defined as an increase in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes of greater than 2.05 points per year at follow-up. Models were developed using the logistic classification, combining demographic, psychosocial as-sessments, and neuroimaging data. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1 score, while Shapley additive explanation values were used to assess feature importance. Results: The model that incorporated all data types achieved the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.834. The top predictor of cognitive decline was years of education, underscoring the importance of non-invasive, easily accessible data for prediction. Conclusion This machine learning model demonstrates significant potential for early cognitive decline prediction, offering a scalable tool for improving dementia screening and timely intervention, especially in resource-limited settings.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. By integrating multimodal data, including demographic, psychosocial, and neuroimaging information, we sought to en-hance early detection of cognitive decline. Methods: Data were obtained from 159 participants in the Biobank Innovations for Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease with Alzheimer’s Disease Study. Participants underwent clinical assessments, neuropsychological testing, and magnetic resonance im-aging scans. Cognitive decline was defined as an increase in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes of greater than 2.05 points per year at follow-up. Models were developed using the logistic classification, combining demographic, psychosocial as-sessments, and neuroimaging data. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1 score, while Shapley additive explanation values were used to assess feature importance. Results: The model that incorporated all data types achieved the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.834. The top predictor of cognitive decline was years of education, underscoring the importance of non-invasive, easily accessible data for prediction. Conclusion This machine learning model demonstrates significant potential for early cognitive decline prediction, offering a scalable tool for improving dementia screening and timely intervention, especially in resource-limited settings.