Academic publishing is at a critical juncture. The challenges faced by the academics are mired in controversy. Among theseare three hotly debated concerns. First is the issue of whether technological innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI)improves research efficiency or if its use sacrifices research integrity.Another is the controversy between paywall publishingand open access. Lastly, adapting an appropriate business model for sustainability is a contentious issue and the choice betweena commercial or a university-based publishing platform is a difficult one.

Traditional models of scientific investigation relied on tedious intellectual calisthenics in all aspects of research —identifying research gaps, reviewing of published literature, devising valid methodology, collecting data, analysing results, and,finally, drawing conclusions. With the advent of powerful tools employing artificial intelligence, these heavy tasks are efficientlycarried out. The dilemma lies in determining which parts of the work can be attributed to the authors and which are ascribedto the output of large language models (LLMs) and other automated assistance employed.Despite requiring adequate vettingby experts of these AI-aided output, many in the scientific community still question these methods. Can research employingAI be considered honest work? Will full disclosure answer doubts as to the integrity of the scientific work?

Indeed, LLMs just gather information that is already out there, albeit more efficiently. After all, science progresses bystanding on the shoulder of giants. AI makes such work comprehensive and efficient. Standing on those proverbial shoulders,however, require access to prior work, hence our next challenge in academic publishing--open access versus paid access.Paywalls limit the benefits of valuable research to institutions and universities with the capacity to pay. Excluded from these arethose from low resourced countries, with nations from the global south being affected disproportionately. Additionally, whilenumerous authors appreciate the features of open access as it improves their impact and visibility, many feel unduly burdenedsince the cost of publishing in this format is passed on to them.

This brings us to our third issue: who bears the cost of academic publishing? Indeed, it is a lucrative industry, generatingan annual revenue of US$19 billion and an estimated 40 percent profit margin. Many, however, find fault in this businessmodel as concerns about the profit motives of the commercial publishers far overshadow their sustainability goals.

How do we navigate this landscape of controversies? We, at the ACTA, as part of the community of scholars, would needto clarify our mission. Our goals for this publication should be consistent with our values. These values, such as scientific rigor,integrity, and accountability, should be reflected in our policies. We should be cognizant of the role we play in national scientificdiscourse while we endeavor to make an impact in the global scene. We are accountable to our stakeholders — nurturingearly career scholars, supplying evidence to health policymakers, and being accountable to those who provide resources tosustain us. This stewardship is essential so that ACTA will stand shoulder to shoulder with the giants on which science buildsupon to benefit future generations.

Artificial Intelligence ; Commerce ; Costs And Cost Analysis ; Disclosure ; Drawing ; Efficiency ; Family Characteristics ; Forecasting ; Goals ; Gymnastics ; Health ; Health Resources ; Industry ; Intelligence ; Inventions ; Language ; Literature ; Methods ; Play And Playthings ; Policy ; Publications ; Publishing ; Research ; Residence Characteristics ; Role ; Science ; Shoulder ; Social Responsibility ; Universities ; Ursidae ; Volition ; Work ; World Health Organization

Bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis (BHD) is a rare cutaneous manifestation characterized by tense hemorrhagic bullae that appear at sites distant from low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injections, typically within seven days of exposure. As of March 2022, only 94 cases have been reported. It most commonly affects elderly males with predisposing factors for thromboembolism, such as carcinoma, and usually involves the extremities.

This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis (BHD) in patients receiving low molecular weight heparin, even beyond the typical 7-day window and in demographics not commonly affected. Early recognition and prompt discontinuation of the offending agent, as demonstrated in this atypical presentation involving a Filipino elderly woman with multiple comorbidities and no malignancy, can lead to favorable outcomes. Clinicians should be aware of this rare but reversible complication to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate management.

Human ; Female ; Aged: 65-79 Yrs Old ; Affect ; Aged ; Blister ; Carcinoma ; Causality ; Demography ; Diagnostic Errors ; Enoxaparin ; Extremities ; Heparin ; Heparin, Low-molecular-weight ; Index ; Injections ; Lead ; Male ; Molecular Weight ; Neoplasms ; Patients ; Research Report ; Skin Diseases ; Thromboembolism ; Women

Abstract Background: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of programmed exercise with telerehabilitation at home in patients with obesity and knee osteoarthritis on visual analogue scale scores, body mass index, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Methods: This research is a pre–post study in patients with obesity and knee osteoarthritis. Research subjects performed a series of exercise programs at home for 28 days. Before the program, there was an initial assessment from a psychologist and a nutritionist. During the program, there was tele-education, telemonitoring, and teleconsultation from doctors. Twenty-six female subjects participated. Results: Visual analogue scale scores decreased statistically significantly every week, until the end of the fourth week, compared with before the intervention (p<0.001). Body mass index and WOMAC scores decreased statistically significantly at the end of the fourth week compared with before the intervention (both p<0.001). Further analysis of all WOMAC components in the intervention group, including pain, stiffness, and physical function, also showed a statistically significant decrease (p<0.001). Conclusion: Programmed exercise as part of telerehabilitation at home has been statistically proven to reduce visual analogue scale scores, body mass index, and WOMAC in patients with obesity and knee osteoarthritis.
Telerehabilitation ; Knee Osteoarthritis ; Obesity ; Body Mass Index ; Visual Analogue Scale ; WOMAC

Introduction: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common macrovascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a simple, non-invasive method for detecting PAD; however, Doppler devices are not always available in primary care and resource-limited settings. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ABI measurement using a stethoscope compared with the Doppler method among adults with T2DM. Methods: A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted among 200 adults with T2DM recruited through convenience sampling from a private outpatient clinic in Iloilo City. ABI measurements were obtained using both the stethoscope and Doppler methods. An ABI of ≤0.90 was considered indicative of PAD. Diagnostic accuracy measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, and agreement, were calculated. Results: The prevalence of PAD was 30.5% using the stethoscope method and 35.0% using the Doppler method. Compared with Doppler ABI, the stethoscope method demonstrated an overall accuracy of 94.5%, sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 99.2%, PPV of 98.4%, and NPV of 92.8%. Agreement between the two methods was excellent (Cohen’s κ = 0.88, p < 0.001). Conclusion Stethoscope-based ABI determination demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and excellent agreement with Doppler ABI. Given its low cost, accessibility, and non-invasive nature, it may serve as a practical screening tool for PAD among adults with T2DM, particularly in primary care and resource-limited settings where Doppler devices are unavailable
Peripheral arterial disease ; Ankle-brachial index ; Stethoscope ; Doppler ultrasound ; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Hand grip strength (HGS) is a tool to measure muscle strength, which is an important component in sarcopenia and frailty. Grip strength (GS) in midlife can predict physical disability in senior years and help evaluate a patient's overall health.

OBJECTIVES

The general purpose of this study is to validate the HGS using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and Jamar dynamometer as a diagnostic tool for sarcpenia. The specific aims of this study are (a) to determine the concurrent criterion validity, (b) to determine the reliability, and (c) to measure the inter-rater agreement of the aneroid sphygmomanometer against the Jamar dynamometer in measuring HGS.

METHODS

This prospective validation study measures HGS using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and Jamar dynamometer obtained from seventy participants 50 years old and above. Statistical methods used in data analysis include Spearman Rho, univariate linear regression analyses, intra-class correlation, inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation of HGS with the Jamar dynamometer and aneroid sphygmomanometer regardless of the rater [Spearman Rho (rs=0.762 to 0.778, p=0.001)]. Jamar GS is comparable to GS using a sphygmomanometer with the formula of [Jamar = 0.54 x sphygmomanometer (mmHg) - 45.12].

CONCLUSION

Aneroid sphygmomanometer can be used as an option to measure GS and has a valid value to predict the Jamar GS value. Hence, it can be an alternate tool for diagnosing sarcopenia.

Human ; Validation Study ; Grip Strength ; Hand Strength ; Sarcopenia

Human ; Male ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Madura Foot ; Mycetoma

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes in the Philippines. Diabetic foot complications represent a prevalent and significant chronic concern for individuals with type 2 diabetes. This poses an immediate community health concern, as diabetic complications may threaten an individual's well-being.

OBJECTIVE

This study intends to cross-culturally adapt the Diabetic Foot Knowledge Subscale (DFKS) and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (FSCBS) questionnaires into the Filipino language as an assessment tool among Filipinos with diabetes.

METHODS

The study employed a psychometric research design, where it entailed Phase A and Phase B. Phase A involved the forward translation of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires, followed by the synthesis of the translations and backward translation. Subsequently, an expert committee reviewed the translations and concluded the final version. The final translated versions of the questionnaires ensured that it can be understood by an individual who has a Grade 6 level of reading proficiency. Phase B entailed the validity testing with the evaluation of the expert committee, and reliability testing of the said questionnaires with a sample size of 30 participants. A wash-out period of 24 hours was given for the test-retest reliability, followed by data analysis. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were measured using the item and scale content validity indices and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, to ensure their accuracy and appropriateness. The content validity of the questionnaires was evaluated individually by the experts using a Likert scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest meaning the item was very relevant and succinct. Scores per item were between 3 and 4, which indicate that the translated version of the items were relevant and succinct or were relevant but needed minor revisions.

RESULTS

The validity scores for the translated DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires were obtained using the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a score of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Moreover, all items in the questionnaires obtained an Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.88-1.00. The DFKS also has an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72, while the FSCBS has a good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The test-retest reliability shows an acceptable Spearman’s correlation at 0.76 for the DFKS and a strong positive Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.73 for the FSCBS.

CONCLUSION

The validity of the two questionnaires was acceptable and the test-retest reliability showed a strong positive correlation among the items thereby making the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires successful. The Filipino versions of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires accurately measure the knowledge and behavior of individuals with type 2 diabetes, respectively.

Human ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diabetic Foot ; Public Health ; Cross-cultural Comparison

Human ; Behavior ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diabetic Foot ; Foot Ulcer

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes in the Philippines. Diabetic foot complications represent a prevalent and significant chronic concern for individuals with type 2 diabetes. This poses an immediate community health concern, as diabetic complications may threaten an individual's well-being.

OBJECTIVE

This study intends to cross-culturally adapt the Diabetic Foot Knowledge Subscale (DFKS) and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (FSCBS) questionnaires into the Filipino language as an assessment tool among Filipinos with diabetes.

METHODS

The study employed a psychometric research design, where it entailed Phase A and Phase B. Phase A involved the forward translation of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires, followed by the synthesis of the translations and backward translation. Subsequently, an expert committee reviewed the translations and concluded the final version. The final translated versions of the questionnaires ensured that it can be understood by an individual who has a Grade 6 level of reading proficiency. Phase B entailed the validity testing with the evaluation of the expert committee, and reliability testing of the said questionnaires with a sample size of 30 participants. A wash-out period of 24 hours was given for the test-retest reliability, followed by data analysis. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were measured using the item and scale content validity indices and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, to ensure their accuracy and appropriateness. The content validity of the questionnaires was evaluated individually by the experts using a Likert scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest meaning the item was very relevant and succinct. Scores per item were between 3 and 4, which indicate that the translated version of the items were relevant and succinct or were relevant but needed minor revisions.

RESULTS

The validity scores for the translated DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires were obtained using the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a score of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Moreover, all items in the questionnaires obtained an Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.88-1.00. The DFKS also has an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72, while the FSCBS has a good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The test-retest reliability shows an acceptable Spearman’s correlation at 0.76 for the DFKS and a strong positive Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.73 for the FSCBS.

CONCLUSION

The validity of the two questionnaires was acceptable and the test-retest reliability showed a strong positive correlation among the items thereby making the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires successful. The Filipino versions of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires accurately measure the knowledge and behavior of individuals with type 2 diabetes, respectively.

Human ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diabetic Foot ; Public Health ; Cross-cultural Comparison

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic basis for a boy affected with Cohen syndrome. METHODS: A boy admitted to Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University in January 2021 was selected as the study subject. Genome DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples from the child and his parents. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was carried out. And candidate variants were verified by Sanger sequencing. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the hospital (Ethics No.: 202106060-1). RESULTS: WES revealed that the child has harbored compound heterozygous variants of the VPS13B gene, namely c.1563+1G>A and c.3007insC (p.A1003Afs*13), which were inherited from his mother and father, respectively. Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), both variants were rates as pathogenic. The c.3007insC (p.A1003Afs*13) was unreported previously. CONCLUSION The compound heterozygous variants c.1563+1G>A and c.3007insC (p.A1003Afs*13) of the VPS13B gene probably underlay the pathogenesis of Cohen syndrome in this child. Above finding has enriched the mutational spectrum of VPS13B gene.
Humans ; Male ; Vesicular Transport Proteins/genetics* ; Intellectual Disability/genetics* ; Muscle Hypotonia/genetics* ; Microcephaly/genetics* ; Fingers/abnormalities* ; Myopia/genetics* ; Obesity/genetics* ; Developmental Disabilities/genetics* ; Mutation ; Exome Sequencing ; Child ; Heterozygote ; Retinal Degeneration