Background: There are few safe effective ways to relieve osteoarthritis (OA) pain; as a result, off-label psychotropic drug prescriptions have increased worldwide. This study examined the change in psychotropic drug prescriptions for patients with OA from 2011 to 2020 using the Korean National Health Insurance Service dataset. Methods: The study population consisted of patients with hip or knee OA aged ≥ 65 years.Psychotropic drugs included opioids, benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (Z-drugs), anti-epileptics, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. The prevalence and long-term (> 3 months) prescription rates of psychotropic drugs in OA patients were calculated. Results: The study included 1,821,158 patients with OA (mean age 71.7 years; 65.32% female).Of the cohort, 49% had comorbidities for which psychotropics were indicated. The prevalence of psychotropic prescriptions decreased from 58.2% to 52.0% in 2018 and then leveled off.The long-term prescription rate remained constant until 2018 and then increased slightly.The most commonly prescribed psychotropics were opioids and long- and short-acting benzodiazepines. The prescription rates of opioids and long-acting benzodiazepines decreased from 2011 to 2020. For those with psychiatric co-morbidities, the prescription rates of anti-epileptics and SNRIs increased, while the prescription rates of anti-epileptics, SSRIs, other antidepressants, and atypical psychotropics increased for those without such co-morbidities. The most commonly prescribed psychotropics were diazepam and alprazolam, excluding tramadol and tramadol–acetaminophen combination. For those with psychiatric co-morbidities, the prescription rates of gabapentin and fentanyl increased, while for those without such co-morbidities, the prescription rates of lorazepam, fentanyl, escitalopram and quetiapine increased. Conclusion A significant number of older Korean patients with OA were prescribed psychotropic drugs in the absence of comorbidities requiring such drugs, including drugs that have little effect on OA and unfavorable safety profiles in older adults.

Background: Despite the necessity of long-term management for fracture risk reduction, adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy remains poor. We investigated the factors influencing adherence to pharmacotherapy among Korean patients with osteoporosis, with a particular focus on treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs). Methods: Data from 725,313 osteoporosis patients newly prescribed BPs or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) between 2012 and 2014, obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, were analyzed. Adherence was assessed based on compliance and persistence over a two-year period, with factors associated with adherence identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Only 14.8% of the patients who started BPs or SERMs sustained medication compliance, with 15.8% persisting with treatment over the two-year follow-up. Compared with BPs, patients receiving SERMs showed better compliance and persistence (odds ratios [ORs], 1.44 and 1.48, respectively; P < 0.001); while patients receiving intravenous administration showed higher compliance and persistence (ORs, 2.08 and 1.76, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with those taking oral medications. Patients placed on a quarterly dosing schedule showed improved compliance and persistence (ORs, 1.55 and 1.31, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with those on other dosing intervals. Male gender, advanced age, living outside metropolitan areas, receiving treatment in non-general hospitals, and a history of previous fractures were associated with poorer two-year adherence. Conclusion This study underscores the complex nature of medication adherence among Korean osteoporosis patients, particularly those treated with BPs. These findings accordingly indicate that medication with more convenient administration regimens and fewer side effects, coupled with suitable follow-up durations, could contribute to enhancing treatment adherence.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: There are few safe effective ways to relieve osteoarthritis (OA) pain; as a result, off-label psychotropic drug prescriptions have increased worldwide. This study examined the change in psychotropic drug prescriptions for patients with OA from 2011 to 2020 using the Korean National Health Insurance Service dataset. Methods: The study population consisted of patients with hip or knee OA aged ≥ 65 years.Psychotropic drugs included opioids, benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (Z-drugs), anti-epileptics, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. The prevalence and long-term (> 3 months) prescription rates of psychotropic drugs in OA patients were calculated. Results: The study included 1,821,158 patients with OA (mean age 71.7 years; 65.32% female).Of the cohort, 49% had comorbidities for which psychotropics were indicated. The prevalence of psychotropic prescriptions decreased from 58.2% to 52.0% in 2018 and then leveled off.The long-term prescription rate remained constant until 2018 and then increased slightly.The most commonly prescribed psychotropics were opioids and long- and short-acting benzodiazepines. The prescription rates of opioids and long-acting benzodiazepines decreased from 2011 to 2020. For those with psychiatric co-morbidities, the prescription rates of anti-epileptics and SNRIs increased, while the prescription rates of anti-epileptics, SSRIs, other antidepressants, and atypical psychotropics increased for those without such co-morbidities. The most commonly prescribed psychotropics were diazepam and alprazolam, excluding tramadol and tramadol–acetaminophen combination. For those with psychiatric co-morbidities, the prescription rates of gabapentin and fentanyl increased, while for those without such co-morbidities, the prescription rates of lorazepam, fentanyl, escitalopram and quetiapine increased. Conclusion A significant number of older Korean patients with OA were prescribed psychotropic drugs in the absence of comorbidities requiring such drugs, including drugs that have little effect on OA and unfavorable safety profiles in older adults.

Background: Despite the necessity of long-term management for fracture risk reduction, adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy remains poor. We investigated the factors influencing adherence to pharmacotherapy among Korean patients with osteoporosis, with a particular focus on treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs). Methods: Data from 725,313 osteoporosis patients newly prescribed BPs or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) between 2012 and 2014, obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, were analyzed. Adherence was assessed based on compliance and persistence over a two-year period, with factors associated with adherence identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Only 14.8% of the patients who started BPs or SERMs sustained medication compliance, with 15.8% persisting with treatment over the two-year follow-up. Compared with BPs, patients receiving SERMs showed better compliance and persistence (odds ratios [ORs], 1.44 and 1.48, respectively; P < 0.001); while patients receiving intravenous administration showed higher compliance and persistence (ORs, 2.08 and 1.76, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with those taking oral medications. Patients placed on a quarterly dosing schedule showed improved compliance and persistence (ORs, 1.55 and 1.31, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with those on other dosing intervals. Male gender, advanced age, living outside metropolitan areas, receiving treatment in non-general hospitals, and a history of previous fractures were associated with poorer two-year adherence. Conclusion This study underscores the complex nature of medication adherence among Korean osteoporosis patients, particularly those treated with BPs. These findings accordingly indicate that medication with more convenient administration regimens and fewer side effects, coupled with suitable follow-up durations, could contribute to enhancing treatment adherence.

Background: There are few safe effective ways to relieve osteoarthritis (OA) pain; as a result, off-label psychotropic drug prescriptions have increased worldwide. This study examined the change in psychotropic drug prescriptions for patients with OA from 2011 to 2020 using the Korean National Health Insurance Service dataset. Methods: The study population consisted of patients with hip or knee OA aged ≥ 65 years.Psychotropic drugs included opioids, benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (Z-drugs), anti-epileptics, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. The prevalence and long-term (> 3 months) prescription rates of psychotropic drugs in OA patients were calculated. Results: The study included 1,821,158 patients with OA (mean age 71.7 years; 65.32% female).Of the cohort, 49% had comorbidities for which psychotropics were indicated. The prevalence of psychotropic prescriptions decreased from 58.2% to 52.0% in 2018 and then leveled off.The long-term prescription rate remained constant until 2018 and then increased slightly.The most commonly prescribed psychotropics were opioids and long- and short-acting benzodiazepines. The prescription rates of opioids and long-acting benzodiazepines decreased from 2011 to 2020. For those with psychiatric co-morbidities, the prescription rates of anti-epileptics and SNRIs increased, while the prescription rates of anti-epileptics, SSRIs, other antidepressants, and atypical psychotropics increased for those without such co-morbidities. The most commonly prescribed psychotropics were diazepam and alprazolam, excluding tramadol and tramadol–acetaminophen combination. For those with psychiatric co-morbidities, the prescription rates of gabapentin and fentanyl increased, while for those without such co-morbidities, the prescription rates of lorazepam, fentanyl, escitalopram and quetiapine increased. Conclusion A significant number of older Korean patients with OA were prescribed psychotropic drugs in the absence of comorbidities requiring such drugs, including drugs that have little effect on OA and unfavorable safety profiles in older adults.

Background: Despite the necessity of long-term management for fracture risk reduction, adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy remains poor. We investigated the factors influencing adherence to pharmacotherapy among Korean patients with osteoporosis, with a particular focus on treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs). Methods: Data from 725,313 osteoporosis patients newly prescribed BPs or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) between 2012 and 2014, obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, were analyzed. Adherence was assessed based on compliance and persistence over a two-year period, with factors associated with adherence identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Only 14.8% of the patients who started BPs or SERMs sustained medication compliance, with 15.8% persisting with treatment over the two-year follow-up. Compared with BPs, patients receiving SERMs showed better compliance and persistence (odds ratios [ORs], 1.44 and 1.48, respectively; P < 0.001); while patients receiving intravenous administration showed higher compliance and persistence (ORs, 2.08 and 1.76, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with those taking oral medications. Patients placed on a quarterly dosing schedule showed improved compliance and persistence (ORs, 1.55 and 1.31, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with those on other dosing intervals. Male gender, advanced age, living outside metropolitan areas, receiving treatment in non-general hospitals, and a history of previous fractures were associated with poorer two-year adherence. Conclusion This study underscores the complex nature of medication adherence among Korean osteoporosis patients, particularly those treated with BPs. These findings accordingly indicate that medication with more convenient administration regimens and fewer side effects, coupled with suitable follow-up durations, could contribute to enhancing treatment adherence.