1.Chinese herbal medicine for dyspnea and persistent symptoms of long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Miranda Sin-Man TSANG ; Iris Wenyu ZHOU ; Anthony Lin ZHANG ; Charlie Changli XUE
Journal of Integrative Medicine 2025;23(2):126-137
BACKGROUND:
Over 65 million people have long COVID. Evidence for using Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) to treat long COVID is growing. A systematic review of evidence for guiding clinical decision is warranted.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the effects and safety of CHM in alleviating the severity of dyspnea, fatigue, exercise intolerance, depression, anxiety and insomnia in long COVID adults based on registered randomized clinical trials (RCT).
SEARCH STRATEGY:
World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched for registered trial protocols from database inception to February 10, 2023. English (PubMed, Embase, AMED and CINAHL) and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data and CQVIP) were then searched to identify relevant publications from December 2019 through April 6, 2023.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Registered RCTs that compared the effects of Chinese herbal medicines or Chinese herbal formulas against a control treatment (i.e., the placebo or usual care) in adults with persistent symptoms of long COVID. The primary outcome of dyspnea, and secondary outcomes of fatigue, exercise intolerance, depression, anxiety and insomnia were measured using validated tools at the end of the treatment.
DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS:
Data were extracted, and eligible RCTs were evaluated using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations independently by two researchers. Effect sizes were estimated by random-effects modelling and mean difference (MD). Heterogeneity between trials was quantified by I2.
RESULTS:
Among the 38 registered clinical trials we identified, seven RCTs (1,519 patients) were included in the systematic review. One RCT had a low overall risk of bias. Compared to the control, CHM reduces dyspnea on the Borg Dyspnea Scale score (MD = -0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.65 to 0.25) with moderate certainty, and reduces fatigue on the Borg Scale (MD = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.74 to -0.22) with low certainty. CHM clinically reduces depression on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (MD = -6.00, 95% CI = -7.56 to -4.44) and anxiety on Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score (MD = -6.10, 95% CI = -7.67 to -4.53), and reduces insomnia on the Insomnia Severity Index (MD = -4.86, 95% CI = -12.50 to 2.79) with moderate certainty. Meta-analysis of two RCTs (517 patients) showed that CHM clinically improves exercise intolerance by increasing 6-minute walking distance (MD = -15.92, 95% CI = -10.20 to 42.05) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 68%) and low certainty.
CONCLUSION
CHM is associated with a post-treatment clinical reduction in depression and anxiety in long COVID adults, compared to the control, but it does not have a strong treatment effect on dyspnea and insomnia. Effects of CHM on exercise intolerance and fatigue are uncertain, and the safety of using CHM remains questionable. Please cite this article as: Tsang MS, Zhou IW, Zhang AL, Xue CC. Chinese herbal medicine for dyspnea and persistent symptoms of long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(2): 126-137.
Humans
;
Dyspnea/etiology*
;
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use*
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
COVID-19/complications*
;
Fatigue/drug therapy*
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Anxiety/drug therapy*
;
Depression/drug therapy*
;
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy*
;
Betacoronavirus
3.Patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II type I receptor blockers: higher risks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection but milder clinical manifestations?
Jie-Lin DENG ; Yun-Qiu JIANG ; Yan-Kai GUO ; Hong-Liang LI
Chinese Medical Journal 2020;133(22):2650-2652
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects*
;
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2
;
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/etiology*
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/physiology*
;
Pneumonia, Viral/etiology*
;
SARS-CoV-2
4.Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: what does wearing masks mean?
Yong YANG ; Can SONG ; Han-Yang WANG ; Yong-Kang CHEN ; Jia-Jia CHEN ; Jin GU
Chinese Medical Journal 2020;133(22):2749-2750
5.Influenza A virus exposure may cause increased symptom severity and deaths in coronavirus disease 2019.
Zhan-Wei HU ; Xi WANG ; Jian-Ping ZHAO ; Jing MA ; Hai-Chao LI ; Guang-Fa WANG ; Yuan CHENG ; Hong ZHANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2020;133(20):2410-2414
BACKGROUND:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak occurred during the flu season around the world. This study aimed to analyze the impact of influenza A virus (IAV) exposure on COVID-19.
METHODS:
Seventy COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital during January and February 2020 in Wuhan, China were included in this retrospective study. Serum tests including respiratory pathogen immunoglobulin M (IgM) and inflammation biomarkers were performed upon admission. Patients were divided into common, severe, and critical types according to disease severity. Symptoms, inflammation indices, disease severity, and fatality rate were compared between anti-IAV IgM-positive and anti-IAV IgM-negative groups. The effects of the empirical use of oseltamivir were also analyzed in both groups. For comparison between groups, t tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used according to data distribution. The Chi-squared test was used to compare disease severity and fatality between groups.
RESULTS:
Thirty-two (45.71%) of the 70 patients had positive anti-IAV IgM. Compared with the IAV-negative group, the positive group showed significantly higher proportions of female patients (59.38% vs. 34.21%, χ = 4.43, P = 0.035) and patients with fatigue (59.38% vs. 34.21%, χ = 4.43, P = 0.035). The levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (median 791.00 vs. 1075.50 IU/mL, Z = -2.70, P = 0.007) and tumor necrosis factor α (median 10.75 vs. 11.50 pg/mL, Z = -2.18, P = 0.029) were significantly lower in the IAV-positive group. Furthermore, this group tended to have a higher proportion of critical patients (31.25% vs. 15.79%, P = 0.066) and a higher fatality rate (21.88% vs. 7.89%, P = 0.169). Notably, in the IAV-positive group, patients who received oseltamivir had a significantly lower fatality rate (0 vs. 36.84%, P = 0.025) compared with those not receiving oseltamivir.
CONCLUSIONS
The study suggests that during the flu season, close attention should be paid to the probability of IAV exposure in COVID-19 patients. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify whether IAV increases the fatality rate of COVID-19 and to elucidate any benefits of empirical usage of oseltamivir.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Antibodies, Viral/blood*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/mortality*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin M/blood*
;
Influenza A virus/immunology*
;
Influenza, Human/complications*
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/mortality*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Severity of Illness Index
6.Differential diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 from pneumonias caused by other etiologies in a fever clinic in Beijing.
Ying LIANG ; Jing-Jin LIANG ; Qing-Tao ZHOU ; Xiao-Guang LI ; Fei LIN ; Zhong-Hua DENG ; Bi-Ying ZHANG ; Lu LI ; Xiao-Hua WANG ; Hong ZHU ; Qing-Bian MA ; Xiao-Mei TONG ; Jie XU ; Yong-Chang SUN
Chinese Medical Journal 2020;133(20):2504-2506
9.Structure of SARS-CoV-2 and treatment of COVID-19.
Hai-Xia CHEN ; Zhi-Hua CHEN ; Hua-Hao SHEN
Acta Physiologica Sinica 2020;72(5):617-630
Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new type of coronavirus pneumonia, which is caused by infection of a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. The virus infects lung cells by binding angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) of cell surface, which leads to leukocyte infiltration, increased permeability of blood vessels and alveolar walls, and decreased surfactant in the lung, causing respiratory symptoms. The aggravation of local inflammation causes cytokine storm, resulting in systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In December 2019, a number of new pneumonia cases were reported by Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, after then a novel coronavirus was isolated and identified as SARS-CoV-2. To the date of Sep. 13th, 2020, COVID-19 is affecting 216 countries or regions, causing 28 637 952 cases, 917 417 deaths, and the mortality rate is 3.20%. This review will summarize the structure of SARS-CoV-2 and the pharmaceutical treatment of COVID-19, and their potential relationships.
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy*
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
SARS Virus
;
SARS-CoV-2
10.Overview of novel coronavirus infection and replication.
Lihong HE ; Wenjun LIU ; Jing LI
Chinese Journal of Biotechnology 2020;36(10):1961-1969
Coronaviruses are a type of positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus with envelope and widely exist in nature to cause respiratory infectious diseases. The novel coronavirus is a new outbreak virus that is susceptible to all people. Up to now, the disease has been widely spread in the world and poses a great threat to public health. In this review, the genomic features, key proteins, host infection and replication of coronaviruses and novel coronaviruses are reviewed in order to provide theoretical basis for the study of the pathogenic mechanism of virus infection on host cells and to provide basic support for the development of specific antiviral drugs.
Betacoronavirus/physiology*
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/virology*
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/virology*
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Virus Replication

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail