Ruptured Sinus of Valsalva (RSOV) is a rarely encountered cardiac anomaly that can potentially lead to adverse clinical outcomes. RSOV increases the risk of morbidity during pregnancy due to the physiological changes associated with gestation, that can exacerbate the underlying cardiac pathology. We present the case of a 29-year-old female with an uncorrected RSOV who required an emergency cesarean section for abruptio placenta. The patient underwent the procedure under spinal anesthesia, with careful titration of norepinephrine infusion and close monitoring of hemodynamic parameters using an invasive intra-arterial line. Given the absence of established anesthetic protocols for parturients with RSOV undergoing cesarean delivery, a comprehensive understanding of the complex interaction between the hemodynamic effects of RSOV, pregnancy, and anesthesia is essential. This understanding enables the safe use of spinal anesthesia in urgent situations, leading to favorable patient outcomes.
Sinus of Valsalva ; Aortic Rupture ; Cesarean Section ; Anesthesia, Spinal

Background and Objective: Brachytherapy is the only demonstrated technique of delivering the high radiation dose required to control cervical cancer (>80 Gray [Gy]) without causing unwanted side effects. There is still limited data available in the Philippines regarding the anesthetic management of patients receiving intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. It is the aim of this study to present the anesthetic management of these procedures performed in a non-operating site remote from the main hospital during the first 1 ½ years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective review of 446 eligible charts was made. Data collected included demographic variables, ASA physical status classification, anesthetic technique, anesthetic agents used, oxygen supplementation device, duration of procedure, intra-procedure complication, intra-procedure pain medications, post-procedure pain medications, recovery room (RR) rescue medications, time to fulfill discharge criteria, and patient disposition. Results: Four hundred forty-six (446) anesthetic encounters involving 117 patients is presented. Charts from 46 patients were excluded as it cannot be located. Mean age of the patients was 49 years with majority having normal BMI. Spinal anesthesia (SA) was more frequently (75%) used compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Less than 5% immediate anesthesia-related complications were recorded and all patients were discharged on the same day. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia and TIVA are safe and effective anesthetic techniques in patients with cervical cancer undergoing high dose intracavitary brachytherapy. Prospective studies to assess other aspects of their care as well as anesthesia-related long-term effects from repetitive anesthetic exposure is recommended.
brachytherapy ; uterine cervical neoplasm ; anesthesia, spinal ; anesthesia, intravenous

Humans ; Joint Dislocations/surgery* ; Spinal Fractures/surgery* ; Anesthesia, General ; Cervical Vertebrae/injuries* ; Spinal Fusion

Introduction: Shivering is defined as an involuntary, repetitive activity of skeletal muscles. Mechanisms of shivering for patients undergoing surgical operation include intraoperative heat loss, increase sympathetic tone, pain, and systemic release of pyrogens. Regional anesthesia, particularly spinal anesthesia causes redistribution of core heat to the peripheral tissues this in turn predisposes patient to shivering and hypothermia. The median incidence of shivering related to regional anesthesia observed in a review of 21 studies is 55%. Paracetamol is one of the most commonly used analgesic and antipyretic drugs around the world, available without a prescription, it has analgesic and antipyretic property similar to NSAIDs it also affects core body temperature through the hypothalamus. Though different modalities have been established for shivering prevention, the search for a cost-effective drug with lesser side effects and improvement of patient satisfaction still continues. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic dose of Paracetamol on postanesthesia shivering on patients undergoing, gynecological procedures under spinal anesthesia as compared to patients not given Paracetamol. Methodology This is a Double blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled conducted in patients scheduled for benign gynecological procedures such as Hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy. Using simple random sampling through fishbowl method and a sample size of 42, all patients who consented to participate in the study was randomly assigned to receive Paracetamol 900 mg IV or Placebo 0.9% Saline intravenously 30 minutes prior to induction of spinal anesthesia. Incidence and severity of Shivering was documented using shivering five point scale outlined by Crossley and Mahajan, while patient satisfaction was also evaluated using the Likert Scale, possible side effects was also assessed.
Acetaminophen ; Anesthesia, Spinal

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine infusion decreases hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of norepinephrine infusion and ephedrine bolus against post-spinal hypotension in parturients. METHODS: In this double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive norepinephrine infusion (0.05 μg·kg-1·min-1) just before spinal anesthesia continuing for 30 min or ephedrine bolus (0.15 mg/kg) just before spinal anesthesia. A rescue bolus (5 μg norepinephrine for the norepinephrine group, and 5 mg ephedrine for the ephedrine group) was administered whenever hypotension occurred. Our primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 30 min of spinal anesthesia administration. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes 30 min after spinal block, and neonatal cerebral oxygenation 10 min after birth. RESULTS: In total, 190 patients were enrolled; of these patients, 177 were included in the final analysis. Fewer patients suffered hypotension in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (29.5% vs. 44.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.95, P = 0.034). Moreover, the tachycardia frequency was lower in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11-0.44, P < 0.001), and patients suffered less nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11-0.70, P = 0.004). There was no difference in Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas analysis between the two groups. However, neonatal cerebral regional saturations were significantly higher after birth in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (mean difference: 2.0%, 95% CI: 0.55%-3.45%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, norepinephrine infusion compared to ephedrine bolus resulted in less hypotension and tachycardia, and exhibited potential neonatal benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02542748; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02542748.
Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects* ; Cesarean Section/adverse effects* ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotension/prevention & control* ; Infant, Newborn ; Phenylephrine ; Pregnancy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a common complication caused by spinal anesthesia (SA), which may have adverse impacts on the condition of the parturient and fetus. Liquid infusion was found to be relatively effective for reducing the incidence of hypotension. However, the question of whether colloid preload can optimize hemodynamic variables in the cesarean section remains controversial. This study aims to determine the effects of colloid preload on the incidence of hypotension induced by SA in elective cesarean section. METHODS: Related keywords were searched on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception dates to May 2020. Studies included were evaluated for eligibility and quality. The primary outcome was the intra-operative incidence of hypotension and severe hypotension. The secondary outcomes included the lowest intra-operative systolic blood pressure, the maximal intra-operative heart rate, the intra-operative needs of ephedrine and phenylephrine, the incidence of maternal nausea and/or vomiting, and neonatal outcomes (umbilical artery pH and Apgar scores). Apart from the above, RevMan 5.3 was used for the data analysis. RESULTS: Altogether nine randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the incidence of intra-operative hypotension, severe hypotension, or neonatal outcomes between the colloid preload group and control group, except for the umbilical artery pH. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that colloid preload does not significantly reduce the incidence of hypotension associated with SA in elective cesarean section.
Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects* ; Cesarean Section/adverse effects* ; Colloids ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotension/etiology* ; Incidence ; Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use*

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardio-pulmonary function of pregnant women, the anesthetic management and protection of medical staff in the cesarean section is significantly different from that in ordinary surgical operation. This paper reports a case of cesarean section for a woman with COVID-19, which was successfully performed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine on February 8, 2020. Anesthetic management, protection of medical staff and psychological intervention for the pregnant woman during the operation were discussed. Importance has been attached to the preoperative evaluation of pregnant women with COVID-19 and the implementation of anesthesia plan. For moderate patients, intraspinal anesthesia is preferred in cesarean section, and try to reduce its influence in respiration and circulation in both maternal and infant; general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation should be adopted for severe or critically ill patients. Ensure the safety of medical environment, and anesthetists should carry out level-Ⅲ standard protection. Special attention and support should be paid to maternal psychology: fully explanation before operation to reduce anxiety; relieve the discomfort during operation, so as to reduce tension; avoid the bad mood due to pain after operation.
Anesthesia ; Betacoronavirus ; isolation & purification ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Coronavirus Infections ; complications ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Spinal ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; complications ; Pregnancy

Since the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardio-pulmonary function of pregnant women, the anesthetic management in the cesarean section for the patients, as well as the protection for medical staff is significantly different from that in ordinary surgical operation. This paper reports a pregnant woman with COVID-19, for whom a cesarean section was successfully performed in our hospital on February 8, 2020. Anesthetic management, protection of medical staff and psychological intervention for the patients during the operation are discussed. Importance should be attached to the preoperative evaluation of pregnant women with COVID-19 and the implementation of anesthesia plan. For ordinary COVID-19 patients intraspinal anesthesia is preferred in cesarean section, and the influence on respiration and circulation in both maternal and infant should be reduced; while for severe or critically ill patients general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation should be adopted. The safety of medical environment should be ensured, and level-Ⅲ standard protection should be taken for anesthetists. Special attention and support should be given to maternal psychology. It is important to give full explanation before operation to reduce anxiety; to relieve the discomfort during operation to reduce tension; to avoid the bad mood of patients due to pain after operation.
Anesthesia ; Betacoronavirus ; Cesarean Section ; Coronavirus Infections ; complications ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Spinal ; Pneumonia, Viral ; complications ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious ; surgery ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Preoperative Care

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: The first research on the erector spinae plane (ESP) block was published in 2016. To our knowledge, no cohort studies or randomized controlled trials of the ESP block were performed in 2016 and 2017. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy of the ESP block in pain management after lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery in 2017 were enrolled in the study. Those who underwent secondary surgery with local anesthesia other than the ESP block were excluded. The primary outcome was the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at various time points until the morning of postoperative day 2. The secondary outcomes were the amount of intravenous fentanyl administered during the first 24 hours following the surgery and the number of patients with complaints of complications such as nausea and vomiting until the morning of postoperative day 2. RESULTS: The data of 41 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 23 received only general anesthesia (G group), whereas the other 18 patients received the ESP block in addition to general anesthesia (E group). The NRS pain scores and the amount of fentanyl administered were lower in the G group than in the E group at all measured time points (all data were less than p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The ESP block provides effective postoperative analgesic effect for 24 hours in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.
Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Local ; Cohort Studies ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Incidence ; Nausea ; Pain Management ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Nerves ; Vomiting

BACKGROUND: Sedation by dexmedetomidine, like natural sleep, often causes bradycardia. We explored the nature of heart rate (HR) changes as they occur during natural sleep versus those occurring during dexmedetomidine sedation. METHODS: The present study included 30 patients who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery with spinal anesthesia. To assess HR and sedation, a pulse oximeter and bispectral index (BIS) monitor were attached to the patient in the ward and the operating room. After measuring HR and BIS at baseline, as the patients slept and once their BIS was below 70, HR and BIS were measured at 5-minute intervals during sleep. Baseline HR and BIS were also recorded before spinal anesthesia measured at 5-minute intervals after dexmedetomidine injection. RESULTS: During natural sleep, HR changes ranged from 2 to 19 beats/min (13.4 ± 4.4 beats/min), while in dexmedetomidine sedation, HR ranged from 9 to 40 beats/min (25.4 ± 8.5 beats/min). Decrease in HR was significantly correlated between natural sleep and dexmedetomidine sedation (R2 = 0.41, P < 0.001). The lowest HR was reached in 66 min during natural sleep (59 beats/min) and in 13 min with dexmedetomidine sedation (55 beats/min). The time to reach minimum HR was significantly different (P < 0.001), but there was no difference in the lowest HR obtained (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: There was a correlation between the change in HR during natural sleep and dexmedetomidine sedation. The bradycardia that occurs when using dexmedetomidine may be a normal physiologic change, that can be monitored rather than corrected.
Anesthesia, Spinal ; Bradycardia ; Dexmedetomidine ; Heart Rate ; Heart ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Operating Rooms