Pathology ; Pathologists ; Public Health

OBJECTIVES

Workers are continuously exposed to occupational hazards and risks. By analyzing recent data on the status of occupational safety and health (OSH) in the Philippines, this study aimed to determine the common occupational injuries and diseases among Filipino workers, and preventive and control measures/activities and occupational safety and health policies and programs implemented across the country.

A review of data on Philippine OSH from the Integrated Survey of Labor and Employment (ISLE) by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) covering data from 2015/2016, 2017/2018, and 2019/2020 was done. The number of occupational injury cases, types of injuries, and types of diseases were assessed as well as the implementation of OSH policies and programs. Descriptive statistics, simple T-test, and Pareto analysis were used to analyze the collated data sets.

The number of occupational injury and diseases in the Philippines across industries are decreasing. Superficial injuries and open wounds (56.47%), and Work-related Musculoskeletal Diseases (WMSDs) (61.82%) top the list as the most common injury and disease across industries, respectively. In 2018, OSH programs and preventive and control measures underwent reforms due to the implementation of the Republic Act (RA) 11058. For OSH programs, there is an increase in implementation between 2015 and 2019.

Occupational injury and occupational diseases in the Philippines across industries are declining. In terms of OSH measures and programs, there has been a significant change over the years, especially after the introduction of RA 11058 in 2018. A rise in the implementation of measures and policies was noted. However, there are still gaps that need to be addressed.

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted global health, especially among older adults at higher risk for severe illness. Despite the benefits of vaccination, booster vaccine hesitancy posed a barrier to optimal protection in the elderly population.

This study aimed to identify factors associated with COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy among geriatric patients at the Family Medicine Outpatient Clinic of Region 1 Medical Center.

An analytic, cross-sectional study was conducted with 183 geriatric patients aged 60 and above who had received the primary COVID-19 vaccine series. Data were collected using a 25-item questionnaire addressing sociodemographic information, medical history, COVID-19 knowledge, and vaccine attitudes. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, identified factors influencing booster vaccine hesitancy.

The majority of participants were between the ages of 60-69 (66.7%, n=122) and predominantly female (69.4%, n=127). High hesitancy rates were notably observed among elderly females (75.6%), individuals with lower educational attainment (79.7%), and single individuals (93.3%). Other significant factors included hypertension (76.5%) and the absence of prior influenza (81.5%) or pneumococcal (75.9%) vaccinations.

These findings highlight the critical need for targeted educational efforts to mitigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within specific subgroups, particularly elderly females, those with lower education levels, and individuals with certain health conditions. By implementing personalized outreach and emphasizing the advantages of vaccination, stakeholders can enhance vaccine uptake and improve health outcomes for this vulnerable segment of the population.

INTRODUCTION

Rabies is a public health concern in the Philippines, where gaps in animal bite prevention and control persist despite national mandates. The One Health approach is a framework which recognizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health. Although the Anti-Rabies Act of 2007 aligns with the One Health strategies, its implementation at the local level faced many challenges in coordination, delivery of service, and program sustainability.

This study aimed to determine the factors influencing the acceptability of One Health approach among key stakeholders as a strategy in the prevention and control of animal bites and rabies in the municipality of Alaminos, Laguna.

A qualitative Grounded Theory design was used in the study. Eleven key informants from the provincial, municipal, and barangay levels were interviewed.

Thematic analysis of key informants’ responses revealed that, despite limited awareness of the One Health approach, multi-sectoral coordination aids program implementation, although operational gaps remain. Fragmented program delivery, lack of formal training and certification, unclear roles, poor communication, inactive task forces, outdated ordinances, weak enforcement, limited community engagement, and low prioritization of rabies prevention collectively hinder effective implementation.

The study highlights the complex challenges of implementing the One Health approach for animal bites and rabies control in rural communities. Effective implementation requires strengthened stakeholder capacity-building and training, enhanced community engagement, improved access to veterinary services, reinforced intersectoral coordination and policy enforcement through revitalized task forces, and ongoing monitoring of progress through vaccination coverage and incidence data.

BACKGROUND

PhilHealth serves as the Philippines’ national health insurance provider and is central to implementing the Universal Health Care (UHC) Law. Despite this, existing gaps and ongoing challenges in claims and financial management systems continue to affect public healthcare facilities’ operations and sustainability.

This article examined the effectiveness and challenges of PhilHealth’s claims and financial management systems in public healthcare facilities, focusing on accreditation, claims processing, reimbursements, and financial governance.

A qualitative multiple-case study design was employed in Quezon City and the provinces of La Union, Sorsogon, Leyte, and Bukidnon, with data collected from 2022 to 2023. Prior to data collection, a certificate of exemption was granted by the Department of Health – Single Joint Research Ethics Board (DOH-SJREB). Data were collected through key informant interviews with healthcare facility heads, claims processors, and PhilHealth personnel, supplemented by document reviews and facility observations. Thematic analysis was employed to examine the implementation of national health insurance policies at the facility level.

Accreditation standards are uniformly defined, yet compliance varies widely, directly influencing reimbursement outcomes. Facilities with compliance gaps often face provisional accreditation, downgrades, or suspension, resulting in reduced revenue. Although the Universal Health Care (UHC) Law guarantees patient access to PhilHealth benefits, the efficiency of claims processing remains uneven and highly dependent on administrative capacity, staffing adequacy, and digital infrastructure. Systemic inefficiencies at both PhilHealth and facility levels contribute to delays and claim denials. Reimbursements are further constrained by outdated case rate ceilings, inconsistent financial practices, inadequate recordkeeping, weak information systems, and poor storage conditions—particularly in lower-level hospitals and rural health units.

Reforms in claims processing workflows, information system integration, and financial management capacities are crucial to enhance reimbursement efficiency. Strengthening these systems is fundamental for supporting sustainable, equitable, and high-quality healthcare delivery in the public sector within the Universal Health Care (UHC) framework.

Climate change is increasingly affecting public health and safety, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations and aggravating existing health inequities. Recognizing the urgency of this challenge, the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health (EOH), College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, convened the Seventh EOH Forum on November 21–22, 2024, with the theme Resilient Futures: Enhancing Health and Safety in Communities and Workplaces Amid Climate Challenges. This commentary highlights key points raised during the forum, with a focus on community-and workplace-level initiatives that address climate-related health risks. These efforts include the improvement of heat-health early warning systems, integration of climate resilience in occupational health and safety programs, and hospital-based interventions for environmental footprint reduction. The presentations also emphasized the need for multi-stakeholder collaboration, localized mitigation and adaptation strategies, and climate-informed health promotion activities. The forum highlighted that building resilient communities and workplaces requires not only policy alignment and institutional support but also interventions on the ground that are inclusive and equitable.

BACKGROUND

While wearing face shields and other gears to protect the facial mucous membranes not covered by face masks are proven to decrease the odds of infection in the hospital setting, there is no concrete evidence of its efficacy in the general public.

To determine the effectiveness of face shield use in the general public in the local setting.

This study utilized an ecological study design, with the weeks when the policy was implemented serving as the exposure variable while the weeks when the policy was not in effect, whether prior to or after, serving as control. Primary outcomes were mean incidence of COVID-19 and case fatality rate (CFR) per week.

When the mandatory face shield use was implemented, the mean incidence of COVID-19 per week was higher compared to weeks when it was not implemented [93 cases per 1000 population per week (ptpw) vs 65 cases, relative risk:1.43, z=-3.79, p=0.0001]. Moreover, during weeks when only less than 50% of the population was vaccinated with first dose (93 cases ptpw vs 52 cases, RR: 1.79, z=-4.3, pCONCLUSIONS

In general, although face shield use increased susceptibility to COVID-19, it decreased case fatality rate in the Philippines. However, a more robust and controlled study in the future may be needed to truly justify its recommendation for the public.

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes in the Philippines. Diabetic foot complications represent a prevalent and significant chronic concern for individuals with type 2 diabetes. This poses an immediate community health concern, as diabetic complications may threaten an individual's well-being.

This study intends to cross-culturally adapt the Diabetic Foot Knowledge Subscale (DFKS) and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (FSCBS) questionnaires into the Filipino language as an assessment tool among Filipinos with diabetes.

The study employed a psychometric research design, where it entailed Phase A and Phase B. Phase A involved the forward translation of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires, followed by the synthesis of the translations and backward translation. Subsequently, an expert committee reviewed the translations and concluded the final version. The final translated versions of the questionnaires ensured that it can be understood by an individual who has a Grade 6 level of reading proficiency. Phase B entailed the validity testing with the evaluation of the expert committee, and reliability testing of the said questionnaires with a sample size of 30 participants. A wash-out period of 24 hours was given for the test-retest reliability, followed by data analysis. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were measured using the item and scale content validity indices and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, to ensure their accuracy and appropriateness. The content validity of the questionnaires was evaluated individually by the experts using a Likert scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest meaning the item was very relevant and succinct. Scores per item were between 3 and 4, which indicate that the translated version of the items were relevant and succinct or were relevant but needed minor revisions.

The validity scores for the translated DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires were obtained using the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a score of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Moreover, all items in the questionnaires obtained an Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.88-1.00. The DFKS also has an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72, while the FSCBS has a good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The test-retest reliability shows an acceptable Spearman’s correlation at 0.76 for the DFKS and a strong positive Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.73 for the FSCBS.

The validity of the two questionnaires was acceptable and the test-retest reliability showed a strong positive correlation among the items thereby making the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires successful. The Filipino versions of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires accurately measure the knowledge and behavior of individuals with type 2 diabetes, respectively.

INTRODUCTION: Social lockdowns and quarantines have been enforced in various populations to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the community. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 lockdown, known as circuit breaker movement restrictions (CBMR), on physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) distribution patterns among Singapore residents aged 21-65 years. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study that utilised a 44-item questionnaire that included sections to determine PA and ST distribution patterns before and during CBMR. It also included information on sleep duration, PA preference and routine, awareness of local initiatives and perceptions on barriers towards PA during the CBMR period. RESULTS: There was an overall decrease in PA and a significant increase in physical inactivity and ST during the CBMR period. A greater proportion of participants reported sleeping for longer hours, suggesting positive adaptations in sleep habits during CBMR. Majority were unaware of online exercise initiatives and programmes offered during the CBMR period, and >50% of the respondents never used an online resource for exercise. Singapore residents seemed to prefer outdoor and facility-based venues for exercise and PA, and closure of facilities was the primary barrier for PA during the CBMR period. CONCLUSION Reduced PA and increased ST during CBMR reflect negative lifestyle adaptations and may have adverse public health implications. Increased sleep duration suggests successful coping, which may consequently lead to physical and mental health benefits. While Singapore adult residents may be flexible with certain aspects of being physically active, they seemed less adaptive to changes in type of exercise, facility and environment.
Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Exercise ; Adult ; Sedentary Behavior ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Female ; Retrospective Studies ; Public Health ; Aged ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Young Adult ; Quarantine ; Sleep

The advances of modern medicine have inadvertently led to a globally ageing population plagued primarily with non-communicable diseases. In addition to traditional medical approaches, nature-based therapy is becoming an increasingly attractive option, with its potential to holistically address physical and mental facets of health and well-being, and to complement 'preventive' and 'population health' strategies, both of which form the bedrock of sustainable healthcare. However, at present, there is vast heterogeneity in the implementation of nature-based therapy, limiting its widespread and sustainable use. The aim of this review is to practically examine and provide a focussed summary of the current evidence with a view to identifying existing gaps and limitations, and to propose directions for future research and implementation within the healthcare setting.
Humans ; Singapore ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Hospitals, Public ; Delivery of Health Care ; Nature ; Complementary Therapies/methods* ; Medicine, Traditional/methods*