Swallowing and Aspiration Risk: A Critical Review of Non Instrumental Bedside Screening Tests.
10.3988/jcn.2018.14.3.265
- Author:
Ioanna Eleni VIRVIDAKI
1
;
Grigorios NASIOS
;
Maria KOSMIDOU
;
Sotirios GIANNOPOULOS
;
Haralampos MILIONIS
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece. info@virvidaki.gr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
acute stroke;
aspiration risk;
oropharyngeal dysphagia;
screening;
swallowing
- MeSH:
Deglutition Disorders;
Deglutition*;
Humans;
Inpatients;
Mass Screening*;
Mortality;
Patient Selection;
Personnel, Hospital;
Pliability;
Stroke
- From:Journal of Clinical Neurology
2018;14(3):265-274
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The presence of dysphagia and aspiration in stroke patients is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Early recognition and management of these two conditions via reliable, minimally invasive bedside procedures before complications arise remains challenging in everyday clinical practice. This study reviews the available bedside screening tools for detecting swallowing status and aspiration risk in acute stroke by qualitatively observing reference population study design, clinical flexibility, reliability and applicability to acute-care settings. METHODS: The primary search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The search was limited to papers on humans written in English and published from 1991 to 2016. Eligibility criteria included the consecutive enrollment of acute-stroke inpatients and the development of a protocol for screening aspiration risk during oral feeding in this population. RESULTS: Of the 652 sources identified, 75 articles were reviewed in full however, only 12 fulfilled the selection criteria. Notable deficiencies in most of the bedside screening protocols included poor methodological designs and inadequate predictive values for aspiration risk which render clinicians to be more conservative in making dietary recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The literature is dense with screening methods for assessing the presence of dysphagia but with low predictive value for aspiration risk after acute stroke. A standard, practical, and cost-effective screening tool that can be applied at the bedside and interpreted by a wide range of hospital personnel remains to be developed. This need is highlighted in settings where neither trained personnel in evaluating dysphagia nor clinical instrumentation procedures are available.
