Prognostic Significance of Serum and Tissue Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinomas.
- Author:
Seong Hoon PARK
1
;
Ki Beom KU
;
Ho Young CHUNG
;
Wansik YU
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea. wyu@mail.knu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Carcinoembryonic antigen;
Stomach Neoplasms;
Preoperative serum level;
Immunohistochemical stain;
Prognostic factor
- MeSH:
Adenocarcinoma;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen;
Disease Progression;
Humans;
Lymph Nodes;
Medical Records;
Multivariate Analysis;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Peroxidase;
Radioimmunoassay;
Recurrence;
Stomach Neoplasms;
Survival Rate
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment
2008;40(1):16-21
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is known to be elevated in nearly all solid malignancies. The prognostic role of CEA in gastric cancers however, is still controversial. We evaluated preoperative serum CEA levels and CEA expression from the resected tumor tissues to determine whether they have prognostic significance in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 810 patients who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma from June, 1998 to February, 2002 in Kyungpook National University Hospital were reviewed. Serum CEA level was evaluated by radioimmunoassay preoperatively, and the cut-off level for positivity was 7.0 ng/ml. Labeled streptavidin-biotin peroxidase method was used to determine CEA expression from the gastric cancer tissues. RESULTS: Serum and tissue CEA were positive in 9.3% and 91.1% of the patients, respectively. They had no correlation with each other. The positivity rate of serum CEA had positive correlation with invasion depth (p<0.001), lymph node metastasis (p<0.001), distant metastasis (p=0.006), and final stage (p<0.001). Well differentiated tumors showed higher serum CEA positivity (p=0.002). Patients with positive serum CEA had higher recurrence rate (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed significantly lower survival rate in patients with preoperative CEA levels over 7 ng/ml than those with lower levels (48.0% vs. 80.7%; p<0.001). The positivity rates of tissue CEA were higher in advanced cancers (p=0.033) and in more advanced stages (p=0.029). Tissue CEA positivity showed no correlation with recurrence or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative serum CEA level had correlation with disease progression and survival in gastric cancer patients, and proved to be an independent prognostic factor. Tissue CEA expression in gastric cancers had no prognostic information.
