Reno protective effect of alprostadil on renal injury caused by repeated use of the contrast media
10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2016.06.008
- VernacularTitle:前列地尔对重复使用对比剂所致肾损伤的防治作用
- Author:
Chanjuan CHAI
;
Zhiming YANG
;
Jin LI
;
Shuwen GONG
;
Yunfei BIAN
;
Yanqing WANG
;
Guobin ZHU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Contrast-induced nephropathy;
Alprostadil;
Prostaglandin E1;
Renal function
- From:Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2016;24(6):334-338
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect on renal function about repeated use of contrast media , and whether alprostadil has protective effect towards contrast-induced nephropathy ( CIN) .Methods 80 adult patients who had ever received contrast examination and scheduled to have PCI within 1 month were randomly divided into two groups: the simple hydration group and the hydration plus alprostadil therapy group.The serum level of creati-nine,urea, Cystatin C, Urineβ-microglobulin and creatinine clearance were recorded and compared between the two groups , and were observed before and after repeated exposure of contrast medium.The incidence of CIN was analyzed .Results Compared with pre-contrast levels , serum levels of urea, creatinin, Cystatin C and Urine β-microglobulin all elevated after single and repeated contrast media use in patients in the simple hydration group ( P<0.05 ) .The incidence of CIN did not differ after single or repeated contrast used (2.5%vs.15.0%, P>0.05).After repeated contrast exposure compared with patients with simple hydration , patients in the alprostadil group had repeated serum levels of urea [(7.4 ±2.3) mmol/L vs.(9.1 ±2.6) mmol/L], creatinia [(87.2 ±25.6) μmol/L vs.(96.9 ± 25.8) μmol/L], Cystatin C [(0.8 ±0.3) mg/L vs.(1.4 ±0.3) mg/L] and Urine β-microglobulin [(207.0 ±31.9 ) μg/L vs.(279.3 ±37.3 ) μg/L] were all lower with higher creatinin clearance [(92.2 ±24.2) ml/min vs.(78.2 ±27.5) ml/min](all P<0.05).The incidence of CIN in patients with alprostadil did not differ after single or repeated contrast used (2.5%vs.7.5%, P>0.05).The incidence of CIN in patients treated with alprostadil had no difference compared with patients with simple hydration after repeated contract (7.5% vs.15.0%, χ2 =0.501,P=0.479).Conclusions Contrast media can cause damage to renal function .Short-term repeated use of contrast media can further worsen renal function without significant increase in CIN rates .Alprostadil may have renoprotective effect towards CIN .
