The role of self-retaining suture in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complicated renal tumor
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2013.12.013
- VernacularTitle:倒刺缝合在腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗复杂性肾肿瘤中的应用
- Author:
Jiwen SHANG
;
Xu ZHANG
;
Xin MA
;
Hongzhao LI
;
Weijun FU
;
Taoping SHI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Renal neoplasms;
Partial nephrectomy;
Self-retaining barbed suture;
Warm ischemia time;
Complications
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2013;34(12):929-932
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of self-retaining suture (QuillTM SRS) in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complicated renal tumor by assessing perioperative parameters.Methods Between 2010 and 2012,78 cases of complicated renal tumor (R.E.N.A.L score ≥ 7) treated by retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with two layers continuous knotless barbed suture (QuillTM SRS group) (n=30) or traditional absorbable vicyl suture (non-SRS group) (n=48) were retrospectively analyzed.In QuillTM SRS group,2-0 Quill SRS was used to suture the deep wound bed,and the second outcr layer renorrhaphy was performed with a 1-0 Quill SRS by the same way.In non-SRS group,the inner layer was sutured using a 15cm in length 2-0 monicryl suture by the same method mentioned above.A second outer layer was sutured with 1-0 vicryl suture across the wound.Cases were matched for R.E.N.A.L score.Comparison was made in term of operation time,preoperative parameter and perioperative complications between SRS group and non-SRS group.Results Renorrhaphy was successfully performed in all cases except 1 case converting to open surgery in non-SRS group.Mean warm ischemia time in SRS group was shorter than non-SRS group (18 vs 25 min,P =0.021).The proportion of bleeding requiring intervention in the non-SRS group (7/48,14.5％) was 4.3-fold higher than that of the SRS group (1/30,3.3％),but the differernce is not significant (P＞0.05).There were no significant differences between two groups in postoperative creatinine changes.Limitations of this study include the absence of randomization and the relative small sample size.Conclusions SRS can be safely used for complicated renal tumor during LPN,and SRS can significantly reduce the WIT and may also reduce bleeding during the operation.
